Talk:FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:25, 12 January 2011 editMdd (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users54,571 edits →FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:13, 7 January 2013 edit undoMdd (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users54,571 edits →FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework: replyNext edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I hope we can find a way to satisfy both our needs here. But this can that some time. -- ] (]) 02:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC)		I hope we can find a way to satisfy both our needs here. But this can that some time. -- ] (]) 02:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

			:Today an other attempt has been made to get this article removed, see . Apparently is not considered enough. :An other option could be to rename this article to something like ], to make clear that this is a "historical article" on a 1990s/new millenium Enterprise Architecture Framework.

			:I am against just delete this article, because it has some illustrative value, how a AEF can be developed and constructed. The same problem about the framework getting outdated in real life, occurs for other frameworks as well. Just deleting the whole thing doesn't make sense to me. Misplaced Pages is about preserving knowledge. -- ] (]) 23:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:13, 7 January 2013

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computer science

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Software engineering.

FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework

I have just undone all recent edits made to the FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework article and instead added a notification that the framework is outdated. Misplaced Pages is no extension of the FDIC and all info given doesn't have to be the state of the art.

Maybe we should have a better look at the article, and see what has to be done. By I guess the editor was under the impression he could remove everything he whated, based on the argument that the work is out of date. But this argument doesn't really count that much. The information can still have some historical importance.

I hope we can find a way to satisfy both our needs here. But this can that some time. -- Mdd (talk) 02:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Today an other attempt has been made to get this article removed, see here. Apparently the notification made is not considered enough. :An other option could be to rename this article to something like FDIC Enterprise Architecture Framework (1997-2005), to make clear that this is a "historical article" on a 1990s/new millenium Enterprise Architecture Framework.

I am against just delete this article, because it has some illustrative value, how a AEF can be developed and constructed. The same problem about the framework getting outdated in real life, occurs for other frameworks as well. Just deleting the whole thing doesn't make sense to me. Misplaced Pages is about preserving knowledge. -- Mdd (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Categories: