Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bishonen: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:22, 15 January 2011 editBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,288 edits Care for a glass of water?: Give me that! Growl! Slaver, slaver!← Previous edit Revision as of 12:38, 15 January 2011 edit undoLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,604 edits Care for a glass of water?: rabid aye amusmentNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
With your alter ego's habit of biting, I am most concerned... ] (]) 11:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC) With your alter ego's habit of biting, I am most concerned... ] (]) 11:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
:The state of being ''rabid'' does indeed come from having ''rabies'', so you'd best keep out of Darwinbish's way. The person I myself bit is now , which, considered per ], is surely a pity. For what could be more economically illustrative of our (or Shakespeare's) problems than her own words? The statement she has already posted on the RfAR page, for instance, provides a kind of shortcut to the heart of the matter. I plan to argue this with the little Futzilla as soon as I have time to spare, i.e. ]. ] | ] 12:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC). :The state of being ''rabid'' does indeed come from having ''rabies'', so you'd best keep out of Darwinbish's way. The person I myself bit is now , which, considered per ], is surely a pity. For what could be more economically illustrative of our (or Shakespeare's) problems than her own words? The statement she has already posted on the RfAR page, for instance, provides a kind of shortcut to the heart of the matter. I plan to argue this with the little Futzilla as soon as I have time to spare, i.e. ]. ] | ] 12:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC).
::Of course, ] is indicative of <u>and</u> an alternate name for rabies - what erudite jesters we are...!<br>The hopefully soon to be opened SAQ Arbitration case should not, I feel, become the NinaGreen Arbitration case - the issue is far too long standing for the focus to be on the most recent focus of advocacy/pov issues; I am hoping that you as an established custodian of that article can provide some historical oversight (pre or contemporary with Smatprt?) of the concerns. <small>(Do I now end this with some reference to Bishzilla? Your removal of others examples has somewhat restricted my understanding of your talkpage protocols...)</small> ] (]) 12:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:38, 15 January 2011



Post messages below, please.

RfAR

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Shakespeare authorship question and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, If you are aware of any other parties who might be usefully added, please list them etc. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:43, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Care for a glass of water?

With your alter ego's habit of biting, I am most concerned... LessHeard vanU (talk) 11:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

The state of being rabid does indeed come from having rabies, so you'd best keep out of Darwinbish's way. The person I myself bit is now blocked, which, considered per WP:ROPE, is surely a pity. For what could be more economically illustrative of our (or Shakespeare's) problems than her own words? The statement she has already posted on the RfAR page, for instance, provides a kind of shortcut to the heart of the matter. I plan to argue this with the little Futzilla as soon as I have time to spare, i.e. WP:NOTNOW. Bishonen | talk 12:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC).
Of course, hydrophobia is indicative of and an alternate name for rabies - what erudite jesters we are...!
The hopefully soon to be opened SAQ Arbitration case should not, I feel, become the NinaGreen Arbitration case - the issue is far too long standing for the focus to be on the most recent focus of advocacy/pov issues; I am hoping that you as an established custodian of that article can provide some historical oversight (pre or contemporary with Smatprt?) of the concerns. (Do I now end this with some reference to Bishzilla? Your removal of others examples has somewhat restricted my understanding of your talkpage protocols...) LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)