Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:53, 23 January 2011

Tiananmen Square self-immolation incident
Charred person seated on the ground with legs crossed and hands in his lapCharred person seated on the ground with legs crossed and hands in his lap
Location	Tiananmen Square, Beijing,  China
Date	23 January 2001 14:30 (UTC+8)
Attack type	self-immolation
Deaths	2
Injured	3

The Tiananmen Square self-immolation incident took place in Tiananmen Square in central Beijing, on the eve of Chinese New Year on 23 January 2001. The incident is disputed: according to the official Chinese press agency, Xinhua News Agency, five members of Falun Gong, a banned spiritual movement based on qigong which is also known as "Falun Dafa", set themselves on fire to protest the perceived unfair treatment of Falun Gong by the Chinese government. The Falun Dafa Information Center denied that the self-immolators were practitioners, partly on the grounds that the movement's teachings explicitly forbid killing, including suicide. Falun Gong sources instead claim the self-immolation was staged by the Chinese government to turn public opinion against the group and to justify the torture and imprisonment of its practitioners.

According to Chinese state media, the five people were part of a group of seven who had travelled to the square together. One of them, Liu Chunling, died at Tiananmen and another, her 12-year-old daughter, Liu Siying, died in hospital several weeks later; three survived. A CNN crew present at the scene witnessed the five setting themselves ablaze and had just started filming when police intervened and detained the crew. The incident received international news coverage, and video footage was broadcast later in the People's Republic of China by China Central Television (CCTV). The coverage in the CCTV showed images of Liu Siying burning and interviews with the others in which they stated their belief that self-immolation would lead them to paradise, a belief that is not supported by Falun Gong’s teachings. Two weeks after the event, the Washington Post published an investigation into the identity of the two self-immolation victims who were killed, and found that “no one ever saw practice Falun Gong.”

Video footage of the event was deconstructed in slow motion by New Tang Dynasty Television, a Falun Gong-affiliated TV company, in the documentary False Fire. The Falun Dafa Information Center, along with journalist Danny Schechter, has claimed that the incident was staged to turn public opinion against the practice. A statement issued by International Education Development before the United Nations similarly reflected the opinion that the self-immolation was staged by the Chinese government.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) believed the incident was among one of the most difficult stories for reporters in Beijing at the time to report on because of a lack of independent information available. Professor David Ownby of the University of Montreal, noting inconsistencies in the official account, allowed for the possibility that the entire event might have been set up by the Chinese authorities, but thought it equally possible that the self-immolators had been "new or unschooled Falun Gong practitioners". Time thought it was a mistake by Falun Gong leaders to deny any association with the protesters, and dismissed as "implausibl" the Falun Gong account of the "episode set up by government provocateurs". Barend ter Haar, sinologist at Leiden University and Francesco Sisci, Asia editor of La Stampa, believe the event was an authentic protest by practitioners, but that the Chinese government's botched handling of it made it look like state propaganda. Time reported that the China's media campaign against Falun Gong gained significant traction following the act. The Washington Post reported that in the aftermath of the self-immolation, which helped erode public sympathy for Falun Gong, the government “sanctioned the systematic use of violence” against the group. Posters, leaflets and videos were produced, detailing the supposed detrimental effects of Falun Gong; the authorities ordered regular anti-Falun Gong classes to be scheduled in schools to highlight the dangers of the practice. According to Falun Gong websites, the number of Falun Gong adherents tortured to death rose from 245 in 2000 to 419 in 2001.

Three of the survivors plus two other people accused of being involved in the incident were put on trial in mid-2001 for intentional homicide; four of the five were found guilty and given sentences ranging from seven years to life. One of the accused, Liu Baorong, was exempted from sentence as the court said she had "acknowledged her crime". Two of the survivors, Hao Huijun and her daughter Chen Guo, did not appear in court.

Background

Falun Gong, a new religious movement based on the meditative practice of qigong, was founded in the People's Republic of China by Li Hongzhi in 1992 and by the mid-1990s had attracted millions of followers. When its teachings, influenced by Taoism and Buddhism, were denounced as unscientific by notable Chinese sceptics such as Sima Nan and scientist He Zuoxiu, practitioners took to protesting any negative coverage. Following one such demonstration in Tianjin where a number of practitioners were arrested, more than ten thousand practitioners congregated at Communist Party of China headquarters in Zhongnanhai on 25 April 1999. From 25 April to July, about 300 Falun Gong demonstrations were held around the country. On 22 July the same year, a decision was made by the Chinese government to impose a nationwide ban on the group.

Following the ban, Tiananmen Square, which has been the central point for several major historical protests, was one of the prime locations where the Falun Gong leadership expected practitioners to demonstrate despite government deterrence, and by 25 April 2000, one year later, more than 30,000 practitioners had been arrested. Seven hundred Falun Gong followers were arrested during a demonstration in the Square on 1 January 2001. According to Time, a Falun Gong website editorial instructed followers to step up demonstrations, "especially in Tiananmen Square"; founder Li Hongzhi urged followers to immobilise the police and other "evil scoundrels" through use of supernatural powers. Jensen and Weston (2006) noticed a marked change in the tone of Li Hongzhi's messages following the ban: practitioners who remained steadfast against the oppression would survive the apocalypse while those who succumbed to pressure would not. Those who died or had suffered were promised "consummation", or enlightenment. Specifically, Li wrote that "any fear is itself a barrier that prevents you from reaching consummation", that "the process of enduring is but a brief moment", and that those who "have hidden themselves ... have sided in their understanding with evil beings."

The Falun Gong human-rights group WOIPFG saw the incident as a major tool in the government's "global campaign to vilify Falun Gong practitioners to the Chinese people..." WOIPFG believed that hostility toward Falun Gong from the general public in China escalated, the campaign "clearly intensified," and that "hate crimes" targeting Falun Gong increased. It further alleged the death toll during police arrests or in prisons, labor camps and "brainwashing centers" all sharply increased. Danny Schechter notes that the CCP's claims about the incident remain unsubstantiated by outside parties, because no independent investigation has been allowed.

The incident

On 23 January 2001, the eve of Chinese New Year, five people on Tiananmen Square poured gasoline over their clothes and set themselves on fire; another two people were prevented from igniting the gasoline.

A CNN film crew, who were there on a routine check for a possible Falun Gong protest, observed a man sitting down on the pavement north-east of the Monument to the People's Heroes at the centre of the square. He proceeded to pour gasoline over himself and set himself ablaze. Police officers on the square noticed what was happening, quickly approached the man and extinguished the flames. Shortly afterwards, another four people on the square set themselves alight. The CNN crew was filming these events when military police stepped in and detained the crew. The authorities then put out the flames consuming the other four people's clothing. A police van came to collect the badly burnt man, and two ambulances arrived almost 25 minutes later to collect the other four. The square was completely closed, and security was tight the next day, the most important of the traditional Chinese holidays; police monitored public access to the square for the New Year celebrations, had fire extinguishers ready, and prevented Falun Gong members from opening banners.

Of the five people who set themselves alight, one, Liu Chunling, died at the scene; another, her 12-year-old daughter, Liu Siying, died in Beijing hospital two months later, in March; the other three were left severely disfigured.

People involved

The official news agency, Xinhua, gave the participants' details as follows:

Xinhua further alleged that Wang Jindong had practised Falun Gong since 1996, Hao Huijin since 1997, and Liu Baorong since 1994.

Reporting

The Chinese authorities stated that the seven people who had come to Tiananmen Square with the intention of committing suicide were all from the city of Kaifeng in Henan province. The state-run Xinhua News Agency asserted that the self-immolators were "avid practitioners" of Falun Gong who had taken up the practice between 1994 and 1997, and that they fantasised during the preceding week about "how wonderful it would be to enter heaven". Six of them reportedly took the train on 16 January, meeting Chen Guo, the daughter of one of them, upon their arrival in Beijing. The seven agreed to light themselves in different parts of the Square at 2:30 pm on the designated day with gasoline smuggled there in plastic soda bottles; each had been armed with two lighters in case one would fail. According to the China Association For Cultic Studies website, Wang Jindong stated afterwards that the group arrived in Tiananmen Square by two taxis, and were dropped off at the south of the Great Hall of the People, from where they walked to the spot where they would ignite themselves. Wang said he was approached by police as he was splitting open the soda bottles, and ignited himself hurriedly without assuming the lotus position. Liu Yunfang explained that the police were able to stop him burning himself because he had not attained the required spiritual level, a Chinese government press release said.

Initial reports

Xinhua released brief details of the incident to foreign media the same evening. According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), the lack of independent information and difficulties in ascertaining the extent of control of the information made the incident one of the most difficult stories for reporters in Beijing to report. Schechter notes that sensitive subjects in the Chinese press are almost never reported on a timely basis; the usual protocol is approval by several party officials before publication. Xinhua then distributed a fuller press release seven days later on Tuesday, 30 January, in response to other media reports on the incident.

Filming by the CNN crew on Tiananmen Square was stopped by the police almost immediately after it began. Articles in the Yangcheng Evening News and the Southern Daily reported that police had evidence that a few foreign reporters had advance knowledge of the incident, and suggested that such reporters could be charged with "instigating and abetting a suicide." State media claimed surveillance video showed six or seven reporters from CNN, the Associated Press and Agence France-Presse arriving just 10 minutes before the self-immolations took place; however, all three agencies denied advance knowledge of the incident—AP and AFP said they had no reporters in the square at the time, while CNN's chief news executive, Eason Jordan, said the CNN crew were there on a routine check for a possible Falun Gong protest.

China Central Television video footage

On 31 January, a 30-minute special edition of the current affairs programme Forum told the state's version of the events to the Chinese public. China Central Television aired footage, said to be taken by nearby surveillance cameras, of five people in flames.

According to an initial Falun Gong press statement, "Much remains unclear and unknown about the circumstances surrounding the incident", including what took place in the week between the incident and when the "fully engineered news articles and television programs" were released. Subsequently, Falun Gong-affiliated New Tang Dynasty Television produced a programme called False Fire, claiming a number of inconsistencies in the accounts from various state sources compared with the video broadcast nationally. Issues and discrepancies mentioned included why the participants' hair and the gasoline-filled bottles did not catch fire, the presence of fire extinguishers, whether Wang Jindong was sitting or standing when he shouted, and the medical treatment and ultimate death of the 12-year-old girl. In a frame-by-frame replay of parts of the state media footage, the film commentary argued that a man wearing military clothing struck Liu Chunling on the head with an object, thus causing her death. Falun Gong lobby group, the World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong, stated that the Speech Processing Laboratory at National Taiwan University analysed the broadcasts, and claimed that the first 'Wang Jindong' on CCTV was not the same person who appeared the second and third times.

Chinese government media reported that close-up shots in its video footage came from confiscated CNN tapes, but Philip Pan of the Washington Post was suspicious of the positioning of the cameras, and the fact that the close-up shots shown on Chinese television were taken without police interference. In addition, overhead surveillance camera footage seemed to show a man filming the scene using a small hand-held camera, rather than a large camera of the type used for TV news reporting. The Age commented that the "ready availability of fire-extinguishers and official TV teams and the lack of verification about the victims" raised questions about whether the movement was involved. However, John Gittings of The Guardian noted it was common practice in many countries for police camera operators to be on hand when a public disturbance is anticipated; the police used small-scale fire-extinguishers of the type carried in public vehicles, many of which are routinely on the square. Schechter noted that state media uncharacteristically released the story at once, yet the footage was finally aired one week later. Barend ter Haar believes that the government may have fabricated a video of their own when they realised the mediatic potential of the suicides.

The dispute

Discrepancies according to documentary False Fire
False Fire, a NTDTV documentary that deconstructs the event points out several inconsistencies in the Chinese Government's version of the story, including:

• Liu Chunling, the only self-immolator who died on the spot appears to fall from being bludgeoned on the head by a man in military suit. The programme argues that Liu could have died from a severe blow to the head.
• The self immolators appear to be wearing several layers of, possibly fire-protective, clothing and masks. The hair and bottle of gasoline at the feet of an alleged self-immolator is intact, although this should have caught fire first.
• Police, who normally are not known to carry fire extinguishers on duty, appeared to have used almost 25 pieces of fire-fighting equipment on hand on the day of the self-immolations. The nearest building is 10 minutes away and footage shows that only two police vehicles were at the scene. The flames were put out in less than a minute's time.
• The camera of the CCTV footage zooms in on the scene as it unfolds; surveillance cameras in Tiananmen Square are usually fixed.
• Wang Jindong shouts comments that do not form part of Falun Dafa teachings; his posture, including hand position and sitting position, does not reflect the full or half lotus position required in Falun Dafa exercises.
• The hospital treatment of the victims, as recorded by Chinese state media, is inconsistent with proper care of severe burn victims: for instance, patients were not kept in sterile rooms.
• The girl who allegedly underwent a tracheotomy appeared to be able to speak and sing clearly mere days after the surgery.

Following the incident, the details of why the individuals were involved has been and remains the subject of dispute between representatives of Falun Gong, the Chinese government, and other observers. According to the Hong Kong NGO Information Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, all of the would-be self-immolators, except 12-year-old Liu Siying, had previously protested for Falun Gong in Tiananmen Square. Xinhua News Agency reported that Huo Xiuzhen, Liu Chunling's adoptive mother, spoke of her daughter's "obsession with Falun Gong", her "worshipping of Li Hongzhi", and how Liu would teach her daughter Falun Gong. Liu's neighbours interviewed by the International Herald Tribune (IHT) stated that she was not a native of Kaifeng, worked in a nightclub and took money to keep men company, and beat her mother and daughter. None of the interviewed had ever seen her practise Falun Gong. Falun Gong disputes that Liu was a practitioner because, by beating her stepmother and child, she engaged in conduct that was "not in accordance with a practitioner's standard."

Doubts about strident practitioners of Falun Gong revolved around the use of suicide as a form of protest – the Falun Dafa Information Center said, "Mr. Li Hongzhi ... has explicitly stated that suicide is a sin." Falun-Gong-related commentators pointed out that the main participants' account of the incident and other aspects of the participants' behaviour were inconsistent with the teachings of Falun Dafa. In the National Review, the Laogai Research Foundation suggested that it was "hardly a far-fetched hypothesis" that the government allowed or staged the incident to discredit Falun Gong, as the government vowed to crush the practice before the eightieth anniversary celebrations of the Communist Party in July. The article concluded that the "PRC's propaganda coup" against Falun Gong relies upon popular understandings of other immolations in recent Asian history such as the 73 year old Buddhist monk in Saigon. The foundation states that "...this situation is not clear", and for the Communists, this was just "another lie." Government sources reported Liu Siying had had a tracheotomy. Speaking through approved media outlets, she said that her own mother told her to set herself on fire to reach the "heavenly golden kingdom". Schechter noted that the CNN producer "standing just fifty feet away" did not see any children. He doubted that the child would have been able to speak to the Chinese media so soon after the operation. University of South Florida masters student Noah Porter commented that other religions have extremists too, and that even if the participants had been practitioners, they were not necessarily representative.

The Guardian commented that Li Hongzhi's new scripture released on 1 January 2001, Beyond the Limits of Forbearance, had confused his supporters. Matthew Forney in Time magazine believed the message had spread into China via the internet and informal networks of followers, and reached more radical practitioners there. According to The Guardian, Falun Gong headquarters in New York admitted ten days after the release of the scripture that "certain disciples had some extreme interpretations we are going to resort to violence", and asserted that Li's message merely meant time had come to let the truth be known about China's atrocities. Jensen and Weston remarked it was clear from Li Hongzhi's messages that he advocated martyrdom over prudence, and that "if the Chinese authorities lit the fire, Li just as clearly fanned the flames." David Ownby believes that the brief message was "difficult to interpret": it somewhat resembled a "call to arms" against what Li described as "evil beings who no longer have any human nature or righteous thoughts". Ownby said nobody he talked to had seen it as a "green light" for violent action; "ut a practitioner at the end of his or her rope in China could certainly see as an endorsement for martyrdom, and perhaps choose his or her own means to achieve that." ter Haar (2001) postulated that former Buddhists may have brought with them the "respectable Buddhist tradition of self-immolation as a sacrifice to the Buddha".

CNN, whose crew was on the scene, reported that four of the self-immolators were seen in flames, with their hands held "in a classic Falun Gong meditation pose", drawing a complaint from the Falun Gong movement. Time reported that a Beijing arm of Falun Gong strongly suggested the self-immolators were practitioners, yet the Falun Dafa Association in New York categorically denied the incident had anything to do with its practitioners. Francesco Sisci, Asia editor of La Stampa, wrote in the Asia Times: "the sect first tried to deny the episode and then argued that it was staged by the government. But no one believed that the government could have paid a mother to torch herself and her daughter, or that she was so loyal to the Communist Party that she pretended to be a Falungong member and kill herself and her only daughter, even if Falungong master Li Hongzhi forbade suicide ..." Time concurred, adding that the movement had been caught off-guard, and its leadership's damage control proved to be inadequate. It added that the "lack of solidarity" was contributing to the sense of desperation of Mainland Chinese practitioners who may feel out of touch with the exiled leadership. Other observers, including Ownby and ter Haar, as well as Gittings were likewise open to the possibility that the act was committed by Falun Gong practitioners; Gittings reported that some observers believed it was possible that the self-immolators acted in desperation and confusion. Likewise, Ownby believed that they may have been practitioners who "discovered and practised Falun Gong on their own (and badly) in the post-suppression period, and ... decided to make the ultimate sacrifice." Other human rights activists said the five who set themselves on fire did so to protest the government's crackdown on Falun Gong. Anthropologist Noah Porter says that even if the participants considered themselves to be practitioners, they are no more representative of Falun Gong than Christianity is represented by people "who shoot and bomb abortion clinics."

The New York Times stated that conflicting claims were still difficult to assess "ith propaganda streaming in from seemingly opposite ends of the universe ... especially since the remaining Falun Gong practitioners have been driven underground." It noted however that one of the self-immolators was able to "fluidly perform" Falun Gong's signature slow-motion exercises in front of Western media. Sisci commented that the police committed a mistake by seizing journalists at Tiananmen – "independently filmed news footage of the proceedings could have been the best proof of Falungong madness. Instead, when the government reported the episode, it looked like propaganda."

Aftermath

The incident continues to serve as a significant reason for disputing the methods of Falun Gong in China. Posters, leaflets and videos were produced, detailing the supposed detrimental effects of Falun Gong practice. In China's schools, regular anti-Falun Gong classes were scheduled on the orders of the authorities; The media incited 8 million students to join the "Anti-Cult Action by the Youth Civilized Communities Across the Nation". Twelve million children submitted writings disapproving of the practice.

Within a month of the Tiananmen Square incident, authorities issued a glossy pamphlet entitled The whole story of the self-immolation incident created by Falun Gong addicts in Tiananmen Square, featuring colour photographs of charred bodies. The State Council's "Office for the Prevention and Handling of Evil Cults" declared after the event that it was now ready to form a united front with the global anti-cult struggle. The IHT reported that Chinese media were attacking Falun Gong and Li Hongzhi every day. Meetings took place in factories, offices, universities and schools to educate people about Falun Gong. The Government announced that religious leaders from across the country had delivered denunciations of Falun Gong. In Kaifeng, the post office issued an anti-Falun Gong postmark, and 10,000 people signed a petition denouncing the group.

Time reported that prior to the self-immolation incident, many Chinese had felt that Falun Gong posed no real threat, and that the state's crackdown had gone too far. After the event, however, China's media campaign against Falun Gong gained significant traction. The World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong reported that hostility toward Falun Gong from the general public escalated, the government had stepped up its campaign, and alleged that "hate crimes" targeting Falun Gong increased. One western diplomat commented that the public changed from sympathising with Falun Gong to siding with the Government, popular consensus seemingly shifted by human-interest stories and accounts of rehabilitation efforts of former practitioners. Østergaard believes that, in retrospect, the New Year scripture was most useful for the Party-state because they were able to link it to the self-immolations, which marked a turning point ending domestic support for the movement.

Chinese state media has published allegations of other supposed Falun Gong practitioners committing self-immolation, apparently inspired by the January 25 incident.

Trials

Five people involved in the incident were put on trial in mid-2001. The authorities named Liu Yunfang as the mastermind, and gave him a life sentence; Wang Jindong was given 15 years. Two others said to have been involved in organising the incident, a 49-year-old man named Xue Hongjun, and a 34-year-old Beijing woman named Liu Xiuqin who apparently provided the group with lodging and helped in the preparation of the incident, were sentenced to ten and seven years in prison respectively. Liu Baorong, who reportedly had suggested the group use Sprite bottles to transport the gasoline, escaped punishment, because her role in planning the event was said to have been minor and she had "acknowledged her crime". The Guardian reported that on the last day of the one-month trial, Xinhua had, by mid-morning, issued a full report of the verdicts; the People's Daily had produced its own editorial by the afternoon.

In a hacking incident, the False Fire video was successfully broadcast on Chinese television in 2002 in the city of Changchun, and interrupted the station's scheduled programming for 50 minutes. Liu Chengjun, a Falun Gong practitioner who hacked into the satellite feed, was arrested and sentenced to prison, where he died under disputed circumstances 21 months later.

The survivors' fate

In April 2002, one year after the incident, the Government acceded to requests for foreign press to interview the survivors in the presence of state officials. When asked why they set themselves on fire, Hao Huijun replied that she had realised the futility of writing letters and demonstrating by waving banners, "so finally, we decided ... to make a big event to show our will to the world. ... We wanted to show the government that Falun Gong was good." At the time of the interview, Chen Guo and her mother were still in the hospital, both having lost their hands, ears and noses. Chen had one eye covered by a flap of skin. Both her mother's eyes were covered with skin grafts. The fire had left Wang Jindong with scarred, leathery cheeks and blackened fingers. Wang said he felt "humiliated because of my stupidity and fanatical ideas." Liu Baorong, who did not set fire to herself, spent months in "reform through labour and reeducation."

References

1. ^ "Press Statement". Clearwisdom. 23 January 2001. Retrieved 9 February 2007.
2. “On Ten Year Anniversary, Tiananmen Square Self-Immolation Continues to Be Deadly Frame-up,” Falun Dafa Information Center, Jan 19 2011
3. ^ Xinhua (31 January 2001). "The Tragedy of Falun Gong Practitioners- Rescue: Doctors, Nurses Rush to Save Life". China.org.cn. Retrieved 1 August 2007.
4. ^ Staff and wire reports (24 January 2001). "Tiananmen tense after fiery protests". CNN. Archived from the original on 22 February 2007. Retrieved 9 February 2007.
5. ^ Pan, Philip P. (5 February 2001). "One-Way Trip to the End in Beijing". International Herald Tribune. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
6. Philip P. Pan, “Human Fire Ignites Chinese Mystery,” Washington Post, Feb 4 2001
7. ^ "False Fire — CCP's Tragic New Standard in State Deception" (wmv). falsefire.com.
8. "The Staged "Self-Immolation" Incident on Tiananmen Square". ClearWisdom. Retrieved 26 September 2009.
9. ^ Schechter, Danny (22 February 2001). "The Fires This Time: Immolation or Deception In Beijing?". Mediachannel. Archived from the original on 2 December 2002.
10. International Education Development, Statement in the United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Fifty-third session, August, 2001
11. ^ Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. "Responses To Information Requests "CHN43081.E"". UNHCR. Retrieved 6 February 2007. In a 23 November 2004 telephone interview with the Research Directorate, the senior researcher on China for HRW asserted that it would not have been possible for independent organisations to conduct an independent investigation of the incident. According to the senior researcher, the incident was among one of the most difficult stories for reporters in Beijing at the time to report on because of a lack of information and difficulties in ascertaining the extent of control of the information
12. Professor David Ownby is the Director of the Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Montreal.
13. ^ Ownby, David (2008). Falun Gong and the future of China. Oxford University Press. p. 218. ISBN 0195329058.
14. ^ Forney, Matthew (25 June 2001). "The Breaking Point". Time.
15. Barend ter Haar, Chair of Chinese History at Leiden University (Sinological Institute) Retrieved 29 September 2009
16. ^ Haar, Barend ter (2001). "Part One: Introductory remarks". Barend ter Haar, Leiden University. Retrieved 29 September 2009.
17. ^ Sisci, Francesco (2002). "The burning issue of Falungong". Asia Times.
18. Philip Pan and John Pomfret, “Torture is Breaking Falun Gong,” Washington Post, Aug 5 2001
19. ^ Spiegel, Mickey (2002). Dangerous Meditation: China's Campaign Against Falungong. Human Rights Watch. ISBN 1-56432-270-X. Retrieved 28 September 2007.
20. Smith, Chrandra D. (October 2004). "Chinese Persecution of Falun Gong" (PDF). Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion. Rutgers School of Law. Retrieved 28 September 2009.
21. http://clearwisdom.net/emh/special_column/death_cases/death_distribution.html “Statistical Distribution of Falun Gong Practitioners Killed in the Persecution,” Falun Dafa Clearwisdom
22. ^ Gittings, John (21 August 2001). "Chinese whispers surround Falun Gong trial". The Guardian. London.
23. ^ "Organizers of Tian'anmen Self-Burning Incident Sentenced". Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the United States. 17 August 2001. Retrieved 4 October 2009.
24. Chang, Maria Hsia (2004). Falun Gong – The End of Days. Yale University Press. p. 4. ISBN 9780300102277.
25. Penny, Benjamin (2001). "The Past, Present, and Future of Falun Gong". Retrieved 6 October 2009. The best way to describe Falun Gong is as a cultivation system. Cultivation systems have been a feature of Chinese life for at least 2 500 years.
26. Controversial New Religions, The Falun Gong: A New Religious Movement in Post-Mao China, David Ownby P.195 ISBN 0195156838
27. Reid, Graham (29 Apr-5 May 2006) "Nothing left to lose", New Zealand Listener. Retrieved 6 July 2006.
28. "Xinhua Commentary on Political Nature of Falun Gong". People's Daily. 2 August 1999.
29. Johnson, Ian (25 April 2000). "Defiant Falun Dafa Members Converge on Tiananmen". The Wall Street Journal. Pulitzer.org. p. A21.
30. Selden, Elizabeth J. (2003). Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance. Routledge. ISBN 041530170X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthor= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
31. ^ Jensen, Lionel M. (28 December 2006). China's transformations: the stories beyond the headlines. AltaMira Press, U.S. p. 105. ISBN 074253863X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthor= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
32. Smith, Craig S. (4 July 2001). "Falun Gong Deaths Set Off Dispute on Suicide Report". The New York Times.
33. Ownby, David (2008). Falun Gong and the future of China. Oxford University Press. p. 213. ISBN 0195329058.
34. ^ World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong, Investigation of the So-Called Self-Immolation in Tiananmen Square, accessed 16 September, 2007
35. ^ WOIPFG, Highlights of Investigation of the Alleged Self-Immolation in Tiananmen Square, accessed October 4, 2007. Cite error: The named reference "woipfghighlights" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
36. ^ WOIPFG (2003–2004). "Investigation Reports on the Persecution of Falun Gong: Volume 1". upholdjustice.org. Retrieved 4 October 2007.
37. Cite error: The named reference schechter1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
38. ^ "Press Release: Suicidal Blaze, Another Crime of Falun Gong". Government of the People's Republic of China. 31 January 2001.
39. ^ Pan, Philip (8 February 2001). "China Mulls Murder Charges for Foreign Journalists". The Washington Post.
40. Mickey Spiegel, DANGEROUS MEDITATION China's Campaign Against Falungong, page 33. Human Rights Watch, 2002, ISBN 1-56432-270-X. 2002-01. ISBN 9781564322692. Retrieved 14 October 2009. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
41. ^ "Tiananmen 'suicide' girl dies". BBC News. 18 March 2001. Retrieved 10 October 2009.
42. China Association For Cultic Studies (November 2007). "Wang Jindong: Blindness, death and rebirth (Excerpt)". facts.org. Retrieved 5 October 2009.
43. David Ownby, Falun Gong and the future of China, page 216. Oxford University Press US, 2008, ISBN 0195329058. 2008. ISBN 9780195329056. Retrieved 11 October 2009.
44. "zhihui.com.cn". www.zhihui.com.cn. Retrieved 11 October 2009.
45. Cite error: The named reference laogai was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
46. ^ Ownby, David (2008). Falun Gong and the future of China. Oxford University Press. pp. 215–216. ISBN 0195329058.
47. "Who's Behind Tiananmen Self-immolation – Serious Doubts on China's Recent "News" Report". Clearwisdom. 1 February 2001. Retrieved 11 September 2007.
48. Lawrence, Susan V. (14 April 2004). "Falun Gong Adds Media Weapons In Struggle With China's Rulers". Wall Street Journal (Eastern edition). p. B.2I. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
49. NTDTV (2001). "False Fire: China's Tragic New Standard in State Deception" (Digital Video Disc). falsefire.com.
50. ^ World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (August 2003). "Second Investigation Report on the 'Tiananmen Square Self-Immolation Incident". upholdjustice.org. Retrieved 6 February 2007.
51. ^ "Analysis and Insights about the "self-Immolation"". New Tang Dynasty Television. Retrieved 26 September 2009.
52. "Report from the "World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong" Reveals Chinese Government Lies – Official Government Media Seriously Violate Basic Reporting Principles and Professional Ethics". Clearwisdom. 5 September 2003. Retrieved 4 October 2007.
53. Yu, Haiqing (2009). Media and Cultural Transformation in China. Taylor & Francis. pp. 133–134. ISBN 9780415447553.
54. Mcdonald, Hamish (16 October 2004). "What's wrong with Falun Gong". The Age.
55. ^ Schechter, Danny (2001). Falun Gong's Challenge to China. Akashic Books, New York. pp. 20–23. ISBN 978-1888451276.
56. Susan V. Lawrence, "Falun Gong Adds Media Weapons In Struggle With China's Rulers", Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition), April 14, 2004. pg. B.2I
57. "Second Investigation Report on the 'Tiananmen Square Self-Immolation Incident.'", World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (WOIPFalun Gong), August 2003. Accessed: 2007-02-06
58. RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS "CHN43081.E" Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. Accessed: 2007-02-06
59. Xinhua (1 February 2001). "Families of Falun Gong Victims After Tragedy". china.org.cn.
60. "Special Topic on the Self-Immolation". Clearwisdom. Retrieved 11 September 2007.
61. Ann Noonan in the National Review, Beijing is Burning: More lies from the PRC, accessed 21/5/08
62. ^ Porter, Noah (2003). "Falun Gong in the United States: An Ethnographic Study (Masters thesis)" (PDF). University of South Florida. p. 105. Cite error: The named reference "Porter" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
63. ^ Gittings, John (29 January 2001). "China prepares for new offensive against 'dangerous' sect". The Guardian. London.
64. Pomfret, John (9 March 2001). "A Foe Rattles Beijing From Abroad". Washington Post.
65. ^ Beech, Hannah (29 January 2001). "Too Hot to Handle". Time. Retrieved 9 February 2007.
66. Rosenthal, Elisabeth (5 April 2002). "Former Falun Gong Followers Enlisted in China's War on Sect". New York Times.
67. Ansfield, Jonathan (23 July 2001). "After Olympic win, China takes new aim at Falun Gong". Reuters.
68. Østergaard, Clemens Stubbe (2003). Jude Howell (ed.). Governance in China. pp. 220 (Governance and the Political Challenge of Falun Gong). ISBN 0742519880.
69. China Association For Cultic Studies. "Self-immolation". facts.org. Retrieved 5 October 2009.
70. ^ Page, Jeremy (4 April 2002). "Survivors say China Falun Gong immolations real". Facts.org. Retrieved 9 February 2007. {{cite web}}: More than one of |author= and |last= specified (help)
71. "Falun Gong hijack Chinese TV station". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 8 March 2002.
72. Xinhua (20 September 2002). "Review: Whole story of Falun Gong diehards sabotaging CATV network to broadcast illegal programs". Facts.org.cn. Retrieved 28 February 2010.
73. "Details on How Liu Chengjun, Who Tapped Into the Changchun Cable Television, Was Tortured to Death in Jilin Prison". ClearWisdom.net. 20 January 2004.
74. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. "2003 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 3 October 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
    Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. "International Religious Freedom Report 2005: China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 3 October 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
    The United States Department of State said Liu Chengjun had reportedly been "abused in custody" and "beaten to death by police in Jilin City Prison".
75. Embassy of the People's Republic of China in Canada (1 January 2004). "Truth about death of Liu Chengjun, an obsessed Falun Gong practitioner". facts.org.cn. Retrieved 28 February 2010.
    The Embassy of the People's Republic of China in Canada stated that "Liu Chengjun, an obsessed Falun Gong practitioner" had been "weak and sick when he was in prison", had refused food and medical treatment, and died in hospital "of respiratory circulating failure, hypovolemic shock and acute renal failure".

External links

• falsefire.com (Falun Gong site)
• Facts.org.cn (Website of China Association For Cultic Studies)

• Use dmy dates from August 2010
• Falun Gong
• 2001 in China
• History of Beijing
• Political repression in the People's Republic of China
• Suicides in the People's Republic of China
• Self-immolations