Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's History: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:18, 5 February 2011 editCliotropic (talk \| contribs)448 edits →Stub template creation and marking: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:38, 5 February 2011 edit undoWaacstats (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers1,348,587 editsm →Stub template creation and marking: commentNext edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:

	I've ] {{tl\|women-hist-stub}} and the category ]. On 11 Feb 2011, if there are no objections, this can be created as a formal stub template and stub category, and then we can start marking articles appropriately.---'''Shane Landrum''' (]) 17:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)		I've ] {{tl\|women-hist-stub}} and the category ]. On 11 Feb 2011, if there are no objections, this can be created as a formal stub template and stub category, and then we can start marking articles appropriately.---'''Shane Landrum''' (]) 17:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
			:I noticed the proposal on the stub project, I think you may be better off with something similar to ]. It will allow you to rate articles on importance as well as the class and not just that it is a stub article. I can't find a page with a description of how a wikiproject goes about creating them and using them but hopefully it's fairly easy to work out otherwise see if another wikiproject which uses a similar template can help. ] (]) 22:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:38, 5 February 2011

WikiProject Women's History

Quick Menu (edit · changes)

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's History and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Getting Started

Want to help but don't know how? Got a technical question? Ask it here. ---Shane Landrum (cliotropic) 02:56, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

I wrote up a blog post last night with more information on how to get started helping. If/when you write one, follow up here with a link. ---Shane Landrum (cliotropic) 14:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Stub template creation and marking

I've applied for the stub {{women-hist-stub}} and the category Category:Women's history stubs. On 11 Feb 2011, if there are no objections, this can be created as a formal stub template and stub category, and then we can start marking articles appropriately.---Shane Landrum (cliotropic) 17:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

I noticed the proposal on the stub project, I think you may be better off with something similar to WP:BIOG/A. It will allow you to rate articles on importance as well as the class and not just that it is a stub article. I can't find a page with a description of how a wikiproject goes about creating them and using them but hopefully it's fairly easy to work out otherwise see if another wikiproject which uses a similar template can help. Waacstats (talk) 22:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:18, 5 February 2011 editCliotropic (talk \| contribs)448 edits →Stub template creation and marking: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:38, 5 February 2011 edit undoWaacstats (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers1,348,587 editsm →Stub template creation and marking: commentNext edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:

	I've ] {{tl\|women-hist-stub}} and the category ]. On 11 Feb 2011, if there are no objections, this can be created as a formal stub template and stub category, and then we can start marking articles appropriately.---'''Shane Landrum''' (]) 17:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)		I've ] {{tl\|women-hist-stub}} and the category ]. On 11 Feb 2011, if there are no objections, this can be created as a formal stub template and stub category, and then we can start marking articles appropriately.---'''Shane Landrum''' (]) 17:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
			:I noticed the proposal on the stub project, I think you may be better off with something similar to ]. It will allow you to rate articles on importance as well as the class and not just that it is a stub article. I can't find a page with a description of how a wikiproject goes about creating them and using them but hopefully it's fairly easy to work out otherwise see if another wikiproject which uses a similar template can help. ] (]) 22:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)