| Revision as of 03:56, 25 February 2011 editFetchcomms (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,593 edits +← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:41, 25 February 2011 edit undoProtonk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers24,727 edits don't let them get you downNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| What the hell, Jack? I hope you'll be back in a few days. Otherwise I'll have to follow John Vandenberg's lead and delete my user page as well. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/]]]'''</span> 03:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | What the hell, Jack? I hope you'll be back in a few days. Otherwise I'll have to follow John Vandenberg's lead and delete my user page as well. <span style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;">'''/]]]'''</span> 03:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| Hope to see you around. Don't give them <!--if you don't know who "them" is, then don't misinterpret this, Jack knows -->the satisfaction. ] (]) 05:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:41, 25 February 2011
What happened? Why the sudden blanking?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I assume this has something to do with it. Wish I had known about it, I would have made a statement. SnottyWong 19:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm certain it has a lot to do with it. You can of course still make your statement, and I'd urge any of the talk page watchers who has any thoughts on the matter of Jack's restrictions to make them clear at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment. --RexxS (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FAmendment&action=historysubmit&diff=415718996&oldid=415705845 is the specific edit which shows that Jack has withdrawn the request SatuSuro 00:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- RexxS, Jack's ban review has been moved to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion; pretty unfindable, I'm afraid. Anyway, see also some socks somewhat daringly weighing in. All the fault of your friend the bitey fish. Come back Jack! Bishonen | talk 00:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC).
- Yeah, this is a major bummer. Jack was a good guy and a good editor. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to see you go Jack. N419BH 01:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Miss you :( --Diannaa 02:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to see you go Jack. N419BH 01:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, this is a major bummer. Jack was a good guy and a good editor. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- RexxS, Jack's ban review has been moved to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Jack Merridew ban review motion; pretty unfindable, I'm afraid. Anyway, see also some socks somewhat daringly weighing in. All the fault of your friend the bitey fish. Come back Jack! Bishonen | talk 00:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC).
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FAmendment&action=historysubmit&diff=415718996&oldid=415705845 is the specific edit which shows that Jack has withdrawn the request SatuSuro 00:01, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- I'm certain it has a lot to do with it. You can of course still make your statement, and I'd urge any of the talk page watchers who has any thoughts on the matter of Jack's restrictions to make them clear at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment. --RexxS (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
What the hell, Jack? I hope you'll be back in a few days. Otherwise I'll have to follow John Vandenberg's lead and delete my user page as well. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 03:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Hope to see you around. Don't give them the satisfaction. Protonk (talk) 05:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)