| Revision as of 13:52, 8 March 2011 view sourceIncinerateAfterThoroughExamination (talk | contribs)23 edits ←Created page with '{{subst:afd2 | pg=David Willis (cartoonist) | cat=B | text=This article has multiple issues and has been tagged as such since July 2008. It is clear that the issues...' | Revision as of 14:43, 8 March 2011 view source InkSplotch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users821 edits →David Willis (cartoonist)Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :({{Find sources|David Willis (cartoonist)}}) | :({{Find sources|David Willis (cartoonist)}}) | ||
| This article has multiple issues and has been tagged as such since July 2008. It is clear that the issues aren't going away any soon, hence my nomination. We should not be retaining poor-quality articles simply because their subjects are notable. ] (]) 13:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC) | This article has multiple issues and has been tagged as such since July 2008. It is clear that the issues aren't going away any soon, hence my nomination. We should not be retaining poor-quality articles simply because their subjects are notable. ] (]) 13:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - Looking at the state of the article when it was tagged ], it was in pretty poor shape. It looks like there's been plenty of improvement since then, but no one removed the tags or discussed them on the talk page. I don't think it fits those tags now, and would suggest they could be safely removed. --] (]) 14:43, 8 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:43, 8 March 2011
David Willis (cartoonist)
AfDs for this article:- David Willis (cartoonist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has multiple issues and has been tagged as such since July 2008. It is clear that the issues aren't going away any soon, hence my nomination. We should not be retaining poor-quality articles simply because their subjects are notable. IncinerateAfterThoroughExamination (talk) 13:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - Looking at the state of the article when it was tagged ], it was in pretty poor shape. It looks like there's been plenty of improvement since then, but no one removed the tags or discussed them on the talk page. I don't think it fits those tags now, and would suggest they could be safely removed. --InkSplotch (talk) 14:43, 8 March 2011 (UTC)