| Revision as of 07:36, 11 March 2011 edit79.117.217.28 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:32, 11 March 2011 edit undo79.117.163.21 (talk)No edit summary | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| On 8 December 2010 I was unblocked and granted a second chance after an indefinite block, becoming again a contributor with full rights. Since then, I've been a very active wikipedian and all my edits were made in accordance with the wiki policies. The fact that I've become a trustable user was also recognized by the admin ], who gave me reviewer rights. | On 8 December 2010 I was unblocked and granted a second chance after an indefinite block, becoming again a contributor with full rights. Since then, I've been a very active wikipedian and all my edits were made in accordance with the wiki policies. The fact that I've become a trustable user was also recognized by the admin ], who gave me reviewer rights. | ||
| ] (who about this report) may have violated ], ], ], ] and ] |
] (who about this report) may have violated , ], ], ] and ]. | ||
| In the first place he a message on my unblocking admin's talk page asking for details about how I was accepted back in the |
In the first place he a message on my unblocking admin's talk page asking for details about how I was accepted back in the comnunity | ||
| Secondly , he with no explanation on ] article. When I on his talk page, he refused the conversation | Secondly , he with no explanation on ] article. When I on his talk page, he refused the conversation | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Nmate against me at ] article. The edits he was trying to revert on the article talk page, but he refused to participate at the discussion, preferring to simply revert. | Nmate against me at ] article. The edits he was trying to revert on the article talk page, but he refused to participate at the discussion, preferring to simply revert. | ||
| He on my talk page | He on my talk page asking me to leave ] | ||
| ⚫ | Nmate also on ] 's talk page | ||
| Last, but not least, he switched the order of alternative names in the article about ] and engaged into an edit war on this subjcet: even if I've showed him 2 times the rule "Relevant foreign language names (one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or is used by a group of people which used to inhabit this geographical place) are permitted and should be listed in alphabetic order of their respective languages" | |||
| ⚫ | on ] 's talk page | ||
Latest revision as of 14:32, 11 March 2011
Hello! I'd like to ask administrators' opinion about the following situation:
On 8 December 2010 I was unblocked and granted a second chance after an indefinite block, becoming again a contributor with full rights. Since then, I've been a very active wikipedian and all my edits were made in accordance with the wiki policies. The fact that I've become a trustable user was also recognized by the admin HJ_Mitchell, who gave me reviewer rights.
Nmate (who about this report) may have violated , WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL, WP:NOSPADE and WP:PLACE.
In the first place he posted a message on my unblocking admin's talk page asking for details about how I was accepted back in the comnunity
Secondly , he reverted me with no explanation on János Bolyai article. When I asked for a clarification on his talk page, he refused the conversation
Next he filed a report accusing me that I fight against sock puppetry, "instead of flattening to a sequestered corner"
Nmate engaged into an edit war against me at Lajos Kossuth article. The edits he was trying to revert were explained on the article talk page, but he refused to participate at the discussion, preferring to simply revert.
He posted a message on my talk page asking me to leave WikiProject Hungary
Nmate also deleted my post on User:Yopie 's talk page
Last, but not least, he switched the order of alternative names in the article about Košice and engaged into an edit war on this subjcet: even if I've showed him 2 times the rule "Relevant foreign language names (one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language or is used by a group of people which used to inhabit this geographical place) are permitted and should be listed in alphabetic order of their respective languages"