Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ohio State Route 369/GA1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Ohio State Route 369 Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:43, 13 March 2011 editRacepacket (talk | contribs)16,693 editsm →GA Review: fix format← Previous edit Revision as of 17:38, 13 March 2011 edit undoDanTheMan474 (talk | contribs)4,606 edits →GA Review: - ResponsesNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
'''] review – see ] for criteria''' '''] review – see ] for criteria'''
<hr width=50%>No disamb. or invalid external links. One must seriously question why you are nominating two short spur road for GA consideration, when the main OH 4 road, that this route connects, does not even have a route description. Wouldn't it make more sense to work on the major roads first, and leave the short (less than 2 miles) roads until the after the major roads are completed? <hr width=50%>No disamb. or invalid external links. One must seriously question why you are nominating two short spur road for GA consideration, when the main OH 4 road, that this route connects, does not even have a route description. Wouldn't it make more sense to work on the major roads first, and leave the short (less than 2 miles) roads until the after the major roads are completed?
:Honestly, does it matter what type of route articles are being submitted for GAN? It does not. This is a GA review is for exactly one article. This is not a review for a series of articles. ] (]) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
#Is it '''reasonably well written'''? #Is it '''reasonably well written'''?
#:A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|n}} #:A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|n}}
#::Reword:"where the intersecting freeway meets Lower Valley Pike." I assume that OH 4 was routed on Lower Valley Pike before it became a freeway. Also, you can incorporate the idea that OH 369 share a bridge with Lower Valley Pike under OH 4, and that Lower Valley Pike continues east undesignated after the interchange with OH. #::Reword:"where the intersecting freeway meets Lower Valley Pike." I assume that OH 4 was routed on Lower Valley Pike before it became a freeway. Also, you can incorporate the idea that OH 369 share a bridge with Lower Valley Pike under OH 4, and that Lower Valley Pike continues east undesignated after the interchange with OH.
#:::This has been re-worded. ] (]) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
#::"highway are now lined with homes"- delete "now" - it is temporal. #::"highway are now lined with homes"- delete "now" - it is temporal.
#:::Check. ] (]) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
#::consider expanding Parclo to ]. Consider wikilink it. #::consider expanding Parclo to ]. Consider wikilink it.
#:::Sounds good. Check. ] (]) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
#::
#:B. ] compliance for ], ], ], ], and ]: {{GAList/check|y}} #:B. ] compliance for ], ], ], ], and ]: {{GAList/check|y}}
#Is it '''factually accurate''' and ''']'''? #Is it '''factually accurate''' and ''']'''?
#:A. ]: {{GAList/check|?}} #:A. ]: {{GAList/check|?}}
#::The Traffic report (Ref # 5) is a bit confusing. I read it as saying only 1,580 non-commerical vehicles and 120 commercial vehicles use this road to access US 40. The other data includes traffic that leaves the interchange to access Lower Valley Pike. #::The Traffic report (Ref # 5) is a bit confusing. I read it as saying only 1,580 non-commerical vehicles and 120 commercial vehicles use this road to access US 40. The other data includes traffic that leaves the interchange to access Lower Valley Pike.
#:::My main intention is to identify the section of OH 369 that sees the most traffic volume. The survey shows that the portion of OH 369 within the confines of the OH 4 interchange sees the greatest volume, which is what the text reflects. ] (]) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
#::Shouldn't Ref #5 point to page 5 instead of page 6? #::Shouldn't Ref #5 point to page 5 instead of page 6?
#:::Corrected. ] (]) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}} #:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}}
#:: #::
Line 25: Line 30:
#:A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|?}} #:A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|?}}
#::Any construction planned? #::Any construction planned?
#:::No. ] (]) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
#:B. Focused: {{GAList/check|y}} #:B. Focused: {{GAList/check|y}}
#:: #::
Line 38: Line 44:
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with ]: {{GAList/check|?}} #:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with ]: {{GAList/check|?}}
#:: Did you check flickr or other sources? #:: Did you check flickr or other sources?
#:::There are no photos available at this time. ] (]) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
#'''Overall''': #'''Overall''':
#:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|?}} #:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|?}}

Revision as of 17:38, 13 March 2011

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 11:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

No disamb. or invalid external links. One must seriously question why you are nominating two short spur road for GA consideration, when the main OH 4 road, that this route connects, does not even have a route description. Wouldn't it make more sense to work on the major roads first, and leave the short (less than 2 miles) roads until the after the major roads are completed?

Honestly, does it matter what type of route articles are being submitted for GAN? It does not. This is a GA review is for exactly one article. This is not a review for a series of articles. DanTheMan474 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Reword:"where the intersecting freeway meets Lower Valley Pike." I assume that OH 4 was routed on Lower Valley Pike before it became a freeway. Also, you can incorporate the idea that OH 369 share a bridge with Lower Valley Pike under OH 4, and that Lower Valley Pike continues east undesignated after the interchange with OH.
    This has been re-worded. DanTheMan474 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
    "highway are now lined with homes"- delete "now" - it is temporal.
    Check. DanTheMan474 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
    consider expanding Parclo to Partial cloverleaf interchange. Consider wikilink it.
    Sounds good. Check. DanTheMan474 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    The Traffic report (Ref # 5) is a bit confusing. I read it as saying only 1,580 non-commerical vehicles and 120 commercial vehicles use this road to access US 40. The other data includes traffic that leaves the interchange to access Lower Valley Pike.
    My main intention is to identify the section of OH 369 that sees the most traffic volume. The survey shows that the portion of OH 369 within the confines of the OH 4 interchange sees the greatest volume, which is what the text reflects. DanTheMan474 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
    Shouldn't Ref #5 point to page 5 instead of page 6?
    Corrected. DanTheMan474 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Any construction planned?
    No. DanTheMan474 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    No edit wars.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Did you check flickr or other sources?
    There are no photos available at this time. DanTheMan474 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 12:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC)