Misplaced Pages

User talk:Gw2005: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:45, 18 March 2011 editHomunculus (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,194 edits →Your recent edits to Shen Yun and Epoch Times: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 15:48, 18 March 2011 edit undoHomunculus (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,194 edits →Your recent edits to Shen Yun and Epoch Times: correctionNext edit →
Line 36: Line 36:
== Your recent edits to Shen Yun and Epoch Times == == Your recent edits to Shen Yun and Epoch Times ==


You recently edited the article on ]. Very similar edits were made to ] from an anonymous IP 99.246.165.59, which I presume is you before you signed in (The IP and your user page both identify as being based in Ottawa). Your edit summaries were very terse—I believe you described your changes to Shen Yun as "typesetting"—but seemed to reflect pervasive if subtle attempts at POV-pushing. You introduced a few grammatical errors, though I can't entirely fault you for that as a non-native speaker. You also added numerous weasel words and introduced some factual errors and unsupported claims for which you either failed to provide references, or you provided references that did not support the information you added (ie. you wrote that Shen Yun is "Falun Gong-funded," and pointed to a Guardian article that did not make that assertion). I could not identify a single edit that improved the quality of the article, clarified the information therein, or even improved the syntax or spelling. I hope you can understand why I reverted your edits. Please try to exercise more caution in the future. ] (]) 15:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC) You recently edited the article on ]. Very similar edits were made to ] from an anonymous IP 99.246.165.59, which I presume is you before you signed in (The IP and your user page both identify as being based in Ottawa). Your edit summaries were very terse—I believe you described your changes to Shen Yun as "typesetting"—but seemed to reflect pervasive if subtle attempts at POV-pushing. You introduced a few grammatical errors, though I can't entirely fault you for that as a non-native speaker. You also added numerous weasel words and introduced some factual errors and unsupported claims for which you either failed to provide references, or you provided references that did not support the information you added (ie. you wrote that Shen Yun is "Falun Gong-funded," and pointed to a Guardian article that did not make that assertion). I could not identify a single edit that improved the quality of the article, clarified the information therein, or even improved the syntax or spelling. I hope you can understand why I reverted your edits. Please try to exercise more caution in the future. ] (]) 15:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:48, 18 March 2011

Welcome!

Hello, Gw2005, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  -Will Beback · † · 01:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


PS: Please don't delete material without any explanation. Such deletions may be reverted as vandalism. -Will Beback · † · 01:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Persecution of Falun Gong. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --MZMcBride 01:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

RE: IP address of Waterloo Collegiate Institute

Ni hao! Thank you for the message you left on my talk page . Do you know which specific IP address it might be? While this list is far from exhaustive, I show nine IP talk pages that link back to the Waterloo Collegiate Institute article. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 14:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

In order to protect the privacy of Misplaced Pages editors, only CheckUsers have the ability to see what IP addresses are being used by registered editors. Sorry I could not assist you! — Kralizec! (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good. Feel free to contact me again if you have any other questions or issues. Zai jian! — Kralizec! (talk) 15:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Merging Penjing and Bonsai articles

I have added my comments to yours in the Bonsai article's talk page. Sahara110 (talk) 20:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Monsanto

Hi GW2005. I have just reverted your recent changes to the Monsanto page as it added weasel words (e.g predatory) and changed the meanings of some sentences without any explanation or reference (e.g some to most). As I am sure you know it is a controversial article and as such extra care needs to be taken when adding or changing information. Also references should be added to any information you add and the edit summary should accurately reflect your changes. Cheers AIRcorn (talk) 20:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree, I will now add references for my editsGw2005 (talk) 20:58, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Shen Yun and Epoch Times

You recently edited the article on Shen Yun Performing Arts. Very similar edits were made to The Epoch Times from an anonymous IP 99.246.165.59, which I presume is you before you signed in (The IP and your user page both identify as being based in Ottawa). Your edit summaries were very terse—I believe you described your changes to Shen Yun as "typesetting"—but seemed to reflect pervasive if subtle attempts at POV-pushing. You introduced a few grammatical errors, though I can't entirely fault you for that as a non-native speaker. You also added numerous weasel words and introduced some factual errors and unsupported claims for which you either failed to provide references, or you provided references that did not support the information you added (ie. you wrote that Shen Yun is "Falun Gong-funded," and pointed to a Guardian article that did not make that assertion). I could not identify a single edit that improved the quality of the article, clarified the information therein, or even improved the syntax or spelling. I hope you can understand why I reverted your edits. Please try to exercise more caution in the future. Homunculus (duihua) 15:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)