| Revision as of 19:11, 18 March 2011 editHasteur (talk | contribs)31,857 edits →Samurai Power Rangers: Leading Ryulong along the path← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:24, 18 March 2011 edit undoRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits →Samurai Power RangersNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *::What personal attack?—] (]) 18:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | *::What personal attack?—] (]) 18:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *:::"On a ], Hasteur is inaccurately stating that the creation of the article violates ] for some yet to be explained reason." That constitutes an ad hominem attack on the person by bringing behavior on annother discussion in play. I express sadness at your lack of understanding of the wikipedia policies and procedures. ] (]) 19:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | *:::"On a ], Hasteur is inaccurately stating that the creation of the article violates ] for some yet to be explained reason." That constitutes an ad hominem attack on the person by bringing behavior on annother discussion in play. I express sadness at your lack of understanding of the wikipedia policies and procedures. ] (]) 19:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *::::Stating my thoughts on your application of policy is not a personal attack in any sense of the word. And the AFDs are related so I am most certainly allowed to mention it.—] (]) 19:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:24, 18 March 2011
Samurai Power Rangers
- Samurai Power Rangers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined Prod. Prod reason was "Expansion of Power_Rangers_Samurai#Rangers that adds ranger color navigation templates. All references point at the series character descriptions and therefore not independent sources."
In addition de-prodder claimed "just only been created and arguments are invalid". Hasteur (talk) 18:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep: It's a recently created stub article that has not been expanded upon yet. There is no policy on Misplaced Pages that forbids splitting off character lists from parent articles and there is certainly no mandatory length requirement on when these should be made. The subject of the article passes notability and previous articles of this type have been kept at AFD because they are completely allowed under Misplaced Pages policy. On a similar AFD, Hasteur is inaccurately stating that the creation of the article violates WP:CRYSTAL for some yet to be explained reason.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- ] Please strike your personal attack on me as I am applying WP policy Hasteur (talk) 18:40, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- What personal attack?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- "On a similar AFD, Hasteur is inaccurately stating that the creation of the article violates WP:CRYSTAL for some yet to be explained reason." That constitutes an ad hominem attack on the person by bringing behavior on annother discussion in play. I express sadness at your lack of understanding of the wikipedia policies and procedures. Hasteur (talk) 19:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Stating my thoughts on your application of policy is not a personal attack in any sense of the word. And the AFDs are related so I am most certainly allowed to mention it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- "On a similar AFD, Hasteur is inaccurately stating that the creation of the article violates WP:CRYSTAL for some yet to be explained reason." That constitutes an ad hominem attack on the person by bringing behavior on annother discussion in play. I express sadness at your lack of understanding of the wikipedia policies and procedures. Hasteur (talk) 19:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- What personal attack?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- ] Please strike your personal attack on me as I am applying WP policy Hasteur (talk) 18:40, 18 March 2011 (UTC)