Revision as of 11:44, 20 March 2011 editSuresh 5 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers1,813 edits →Welcome← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:49, 20 March 2011 edit undo5 albert square (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators68,587 edits Reverted to revision 419590492 by Seaphoto; rv to this revision to remove all nonsense. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
''Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each header to edit that header.''<br /> | ''Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each header to edit that header.''<br /> | ||
''This page is automatically archived by ].''<br /> | ''This page is automatically archived by ].''<br /> | ||
''ClueBot's owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply '''on this page''' unless you request otherwise.'' |
''ClueBot's owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply '''on this page''' unless you request otherwise.'' | ||
{| style="float: left; clear: left;" | {| style="float: left; clear: left;" | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:: I'd also be interested in getting a copy of the CBNG source-code. Besides curiosity, it would be nice to get a look at the bot's warning logic, s.t. I can better interface my own tool. Thanks, ] (]) 21:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC). (Repost from archives) ] (]) 03:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | :: I'd also be interested in getting a copy of the CBNG source-code. Besides curiosity, it would be nice to get a look at the bot's warning logic, s.t. I can better interface my own tool. Thanks, ] (]) 21:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC). (Repost from archives) ] (]) 03:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
= |
Revision as of 11:49, 20 March 2011
This page is for comments on the bot or questions about the bot.
Report false positives on the false positives page, not here.
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each header to edit that header.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
ClueBot's owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page unless you request otherwise.
ClueBots | |
---|---|
ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script | |
ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
|
Reply form 2.96.193.79
You say:
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Glasgow, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Misplaced Pages articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Glasgow was changed by 2.96.193.79 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-01-07T16:50:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- I say:
- I'm not quite sure how this works, but this PC connects through TalkTalk, and as far as I know, and I've done tests, our IP Address changes every time (or so I thought) we connect. However, as you can see, we still have (or have once again been alloctaed - is maybe what has happened - which is why I just see your message now) the same IPA as was vandalising back in early January. Odd. It's almost definitly true to say that no one in this household would make any comment regarding Rangers or Celtic - none of us care (although we do live in Glasgow), so we are not the culprit. Just thought I should let you know. 2.96.193.79 (talk) 22:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hello
- If that's the case it sounds as if you've got a message from ClueBot NG that was destined for another user. That can sometimes happen, especially if you are assigned a new IP address every time you log on. If that's the case please accept ClueBot NG's apologies :) --5 albert square (talk) 23:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
ClueBot's Warnings
I was blocking this user when I noticed this. You will see there that another user already gave PowerFiddle a final warning. However when ClueBot reverted another edit the Bot has simply given another level 4 warning instead of reporting the user? --5 albert square (talk) 23:07, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Review Interface Dump (per archives)
(Repost from archives) Hi again, CBNG team. I've noticed that the bot has been down for several days. I hope everything is okay on that front. I am writing to see if I can get a copy of data produced by the review interface -- so that I can use it to refine STiki's training. Just a simple "RID,{0,1}" CSV file would more than suffice. Thanks, West.andrew.g (talk) 19:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'd also be interested in getting a copy of the CBNG source-code. Besides curiosity, it would be nice to get a look at the bot's warning logic, s.t. I can better interface my own tool. Thanks, West.andrew.g (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC). (Repost from archives) West.andrew.g (talk) 03:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)