| Revision as of 02:01, 3 March 2006 edit130.126.146.224 (talk) updated header← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:39, 3 March 2006 edit undoKit Jarrell (talk | contribs)26 edits →[] (2nd Nomination)Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| * '''Keep'''- It seems to me that Bambenek has been in the news, and is a member of the media.--] 23:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | * '''Keep'''- It seems to me that Bambenek has been in the news, and is a member of the media.--] 23:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :Note: User's --] 23:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | :Note: User's --] 23:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep'''- He's a writer and highly respected IT professional that is very well-known in several technical and literary circles. There's no reason to delete him at all. There are far more articles that are much more deserving of deletion. ] 02:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:39, 3 March 2006
John Bambenek (2nd Nomination)
- Second nomination. The prior nomination: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/John Bambenek
Delete. This is a vanity page. Why does he have his own page? What has he done? What is he famous for? 12.221.103.5 22:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Broken AfD nom by anon, that was
incompletelyde-listed by an admin. Re-listing. — User:Adrian/zap2.js 22:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per previous AfD, possible attack nom (but WP:AGF), and 'cause anons don't generally get to nominate things for AfD. — User:Adrian/zap2.js 22:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- KEEP- He is an influential member of the blogging community. He did excellent work breaking key stories such as the CNN X story in late 2005, working on the image recovery that helped prove it to be a technical glitch. He also does articles that help other bloggers, hundreds at times, write stories. -- RealTeen 23:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Note: User's first edit --Ragib 23:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep- It seems to me that Bambenek has been in the news, and is a member of the media.--KenderTWA 23:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Note: User's first edit --Ragib 23:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep- He's a writer and highly respected IT professional that is very well-known in several technical and literary circles. There's no reason to delete him at all. There are far more articles that are much more deserving of deletion. Kit Jarrell 02:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)