| Revision as of 16:45, 3 April 2011 editDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits dispute with Bearian← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:56, 3 April 2011 edit undoBulldog123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,423 edits →Dispute with BearianNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| ==Dispute with Bearian== | ==Dispute with Bearian== | ||
| *Each of you asked for my comment. I'm posting the identical answer on each talk p. Bearian, I've learned not to use the word vandal or vandalism with respect to any established Wikipedian, no matter how unconstructive their editing. (But it does occur fro time to time in my edit summaries when I use a so called "Friendly" template, and if there's a complaint I apologize.) Even when they are actually doing the sort of thing that we would call vandalism if done by a outsider, it tends to evoke hostility. On the underlying dispute, Bulldog, the edits you have been making in removing group identity lists and categories from articles after the categories or lists have survived an XfD discussion, are purely destructive and irrational. I see from your talk page history you have received many warnings about this, and if I had not been myself involved in the arguments about these lists and categories, I would now consider blocking block you, and I will not object if any other admin does so. ''']''' (]) 16:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | *Each of you asked for my comment. I'm posting the identical answer on each talk p. Bearian, I've learned not to use the word vandal or vandalism with respect to any established Wikipedian, no matter how unconstructive their editing. (But it does occur fro time to time in my edit summaries when I use a so called "Friendly" template, and if there's a complaint I apologize.) Even when they are actually doing the sort of thing that we would call vandalism if done by a outsider, it tends to evoke hostility. On the underlying dispute, Bulldog, the edits you have been making in removing group identity lists and categories from articles after the categories or lists have survived an XfD discussion, are purely destructive and irrational. I see from your talk page history you have received many warnings about this, and if I had not been myself involved in the arguments about these lists and categories, I would now consider blocking block you, and I will not object if any other admin does so. ''']''' (]) 16:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :Many warnings? I see NO warnings aside from ''questions'' about why I do it. Blocking me for content-related disputes? Are you being serious? I can't even tell. I have a legitimate policy-based reason for every edit I made -- including the removal of the SPAMing of "See Also" links that is used in an ''improper'' way. Where in ] does it say I can be blocked for such behavior? ] 16:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:56, 3 April 2011
 | Bulldog123 is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
Category:American sportspeople of German descent
Just an FYI, but this category wasn't tagged during your mass "American sportspeople of European descent" categories nom, so I didn't feel comfortable deleting it. I won't have a problem with deleting it per C1 once it is empty for 4 days, however (although if someone were to recreate it, it wouldn't qualify for a G4 deletion as recreation). You may wish to do a new nom for this category if you want G4 deletion precedent to apply to this particular category. VegaDark (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I must have accidentally missed tagging it. Bulldog123 08:21, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Dispute with Bearian
- Each of you asked for my comment. I'm posting the identical answer on each talk p. Bearian, I've learned not to use the word vandal or vandalism with respect to any established Wikipedian, no matter how unconstructive their editing. (But it does occur fro time to time in my edit summaries when I use a so called "Friendly" template, and if there's a complaint I apologize.) Even when they are actually doing the sort of thing that we would call vandalism if done by a outsider, it tends to evoke hostility. On the underlying dispute, Bulldog, the edits you have been making in removing group identity lists and categories from articles after the categories or lists have survived an XfD discussion, are purely destructive and irrational. I see from your talk page history you have received many warnings about this, and if I had not been myself involved in the arguments about these lists and categories, I would now consider blocking block you, and I will not object if any other admin does so. DGG ( talk ) 16:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- Many warnings? I see NO warnings aside from questions about why I do it. Blocking me for content-related disputes? Are you being serious? I can't even tell. I have a legitimate policy-based reason for every edit I made -- including the removal of the SPAMing of "See Also" links that is used in an improper way. Where in WP:BLOCK does it say I can be blocked for such behavior? Bulldog123 16:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)