Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Masters of Destruction: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:22, 6 March 2006 editJoshuaZ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,657 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 16:39, 6 March 2006 edit undoDeiz (talk | contribs)Administrators16,452 edits []Next edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
*Gang is mentioned gang identification website, local news comment piece, reputable local newspaper, and generally all over Google search]. They are real and like the hilariously inadequate ] they should be ‘’’kept’’’, but the copy should be edited mercilessly. ] 15:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *Gang is mentioned gang identification website, local news comment piece, reputable local newspaper, and generally all over Google search]. They are real and like the hilariously inadequate ] they should be ‘’’kept’’’, but the copy should be edited mercilessly. ] 15:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per Vizjim. ] 16:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' per Vizjim. ] 16:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'' this pathetic nonsense. Today seems to be GangCruft day. It's an ''encyclopedia'' folks. ] 16:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:39, 6 March 2006

Masters of Destruction

Article currently totally uncited. Google news shows one hit and vanilla google shows nothing to indicate they are encyclopedic outside being one of over twenty gangs mentioned in a local paper. Delete. - brenneman 13:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)