| Revision as of 22:52, 6 March 2006 editEncyclopedist (talk | contribs)9,098 edits →[]: d← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:29, 11 March 2006 edit undoPablo-flores (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,695 edits →[]: deleted, closingNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''delete'''. --] <span style="font-size: 80%">(])</span> 14:29, 11 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| No google hits for title, appears to be Original Research. '''Delete'''. ] 04:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | No google hits for title, appears to be Original Research. '''Delete'''. ] 04:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 9: | Line 15: | ||
| * '''Delete''' as OR. ] 17:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' as OR. ] 17:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per well argued nomination. ]]]] 22:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per well argued nomination. ]]]] 22:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div> | |||
Revision as of 14:29, 11 March 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:29, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Bilateral Cotranscendentalism
No google hits for title, appears to be Original Research. Delete. Fightindaman 04:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Misplaced Pages is not for things made up in school one day. Looks like somebody read Emerson and decided to create a religion out of it. The history of stuff he had in there and then blanked makes for amusing reading. Fan1967 04:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NFT and WP:NOR -- Samir ∙ C
04:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Bucketsofg 04:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Last time I checked, WP is not for starting cults. dbtfz 05:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Alpha269 14:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Siva1979 14:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as OR. Smerdis of Tlön 17:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per well argued nomination. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 22:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.