| Revision as of 00:48, 7 March 2006 editAlpha269 (talk | contribs)179 edits →[]: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:51, 8 March 2006 edit undoMailer diablo (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators55,575 edits Closing debate; result was deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''delete'''. ] 00:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| '''Delete''' No google results found for such a phrase ] 21:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | '''Delete''' No google results found for such a phrase ] 21:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per Adrian. -- ] 00:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per Adrian. -- ] 00:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| {{PRODcomment}} ] ] 22:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | {{PRODcomment}} ] ] 22:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div> | |||
Revision as of 00:51, 8 March 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Share-aunt
Delete No google results found for such a phrase Wickethewok 21:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unverifiable and/or original research / dictdef / protoneologism . — User:Adrian/zap2.js 22:04, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Garbage. --Krashlandon (e) 22:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kusma (討論) 22:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Adrian. -- Alpha269 00:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- ~~~~ Kusma (討論) 22:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.