Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Rachel Marsden (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:11, 7 March 2006 view source70.25.152.39 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:43, 7 March 2006 view source 192.197.82.153 (talk) vote deleteNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:


My name is Rachel Marsden--the person this article is about. It is so incredibly wrong, biased and libelous that I have attempted to contact Misplaced Pages founder Jim Wales personally, by phone, to no avail. I don't threaten people with legal action, but would suggest that an article like this does Misplaced Pages a real disservice and has certainly destroyed its credibility in my view, as a working journalist. Even the slightest attempt at fairness--if not accuracy--would have been appreciated. Regards, Rachel Marsden, 7 March 2006 My name is Rachel Marsden--the person this article is about. It is so incredibly wrong, biased and libelous that I have attempted to contact Misplaced Pages founder Jim Wales personally, by phone, to no avail. I don't threaten people with legal action, but would suggest that an article like this does Misplaced Pages a real disservice and has certainly destroyed its credibility in my view, as a working journalist. Even the slightest attempt at fairness--if not accuracy--would have been appreciated. Regards, Rachel Marsden, 7 March 2006

Delete] 15:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:43, 7 March 2006

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rachel_Marsden2

The "Speedy Keep" decision was a blatant attamept to prevent discussion. This article is libelous and leaves Misplaced Pages open to a lawsuit. It is am attempt to smear the subject. It is filled with POV, slected facts. Please read "talk" page before voting to see the objections raised. Several Canadian Misplaced Pages editors refuse to do anything to restrain the stalking of the subject of this article by the authors Isotelus 12:46, 7 March 2006 (UTC) Delete

One of the worst articles on Misplaced Pages. Point of view is so blatant and negative that it's beyond fixing and a whole new article is needed. Delete Mark Bourrie 12:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

My name is Rachel Marsden--the person this article is about. It is so incredibly wrong, biased and libelous that I have attempted to contact Misplaced Pages founder Jim Wales personally, by phone, to no avail. I don't threaten people with legal action, but would suggest that an article like this does Misplaced Pages a real disservice and has certainly destroyed its credibility in my view, as a working journalist. Even the slightest attempt at fairness--if not accuracy--would have been appreciated. Regards, Rachel Marsden, 7 March 2006

Delete192.197.82.153 15:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)