Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Les Enfants D'ombre: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:53, 8 March 2006 editAaronS (talk | contribs)3,353 edits →[]: Delete← Previous edit Revision as of 19:02, 8 March 2006 edit undoJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,070 edits →[]: UserfiedNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''Speedily userfied''' per ] and ]. ] 19:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
Seems like a school project, or a NN play. Poorly written, although that is no criteria for deletion. No directs hits on google, and it is not a copyvio. Similar to nonsense, although it must make sense to the author. One contributor. Listed on AFD as contributor may wish to comment. ]|<sup>]</sup> 00:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC) Seems like a school project, or a NN play. Poorly written, although that is no criteria for deletion. No directs hits on google, and it is not a copyvio. Similar to nonsense, although it must make sense to the author. One contributor. Listed on AFD as contributor may wish to comment. ]|<sup>]</sup> 00:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Line 23: Line 29:
*'''Delete''', pursued by a bear. ] 15:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''', pursued by a bear. ] 15:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' in blind and sheep-like agreement. --] 16:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' in blind and sheep-like agreement. --] 16:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div>

Revision as of 19:02, 8 March 2006

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily userfied per WP:SNOW and WP:BITE. Just zis Guy you know? 19:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Les Enfants D'ombre

Seems like a school project, or a NN play. Poorly written, although that is no criteria for deletion. No directs hits on google, and it is not a copyvio. Similar to nonsense, although it must make sense to the author. One contributor. Listed on AFD as contributor may wish to comment. Kareeser| 00:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

*cocks head* Come again? ;x — User:Adrian/zap2.js 02:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.