| Revision as of 16:28, 10 May 2011 view sourceMbz1 (talk | contribs)22,338 edits →Would not like to discuss the people behind their backs: +cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:29, 10 May 2011 view source Mbz1 (talk | contribs)22,338 edits →Would not like to discuss the people behind their backs: clarifiedNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| BTW it has been more than a month since you have lifted my unheard of, unfair and humiliating bans that I was forced to accept, and I have not made a single contributions to any of those boards, except my own AE case.Regards.--] (]) 14:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC) | BTW it has been more than a month since you have lifted my unheard of, unfair and humiliating bans that I was forced to accept, and I have not made a single contributions to any of those boards, except my own AE case.Regards.--] (]) 14:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :@Mbz1: A lot of things are unfair. But unfortunately, there is nothing you can do except following ] and ]. ] (]) 16:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC) | :@Mbz1: A lot of things are unfair. But unfortunately, there is nothing you can do except following ] and ]. ] (]) 16:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::I forgave, but the lessons should be learned from this in order to prevent the same unfairness happen to other editors. --] (]) 16:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC) | ::I forgave, but the lessons should be learned from this in order to prevent the same unfairness happen to other editors. Wrong actions and unfair blocks should be discussed not to punish somebody, but to learn. --] (]) 16:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 10 May 2011
| |
| archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 |
If I left a post on your talk page...
Please answer there. I'll see it, no worries.
Are you here because I deleted your article?
Please read through this first to find out why.
NS Antarctica Expedition
On 10:34, 20 May 2010 you stated in an edit, in references, "Ritscher's expedition report, more information pending" - is their any more information please?
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.16.5, 1.17b1; 1.18 branched; UploadWizard the default; Berlin Hackathon; brief news
Would not like to discuss the people behind their backs
Hi Gwen, Here I explained to user:SarekOfVulcan why I opposed his RFA. In order to do this I had to bring up your conduct, when you unfairly blocked me after being canvased. BTW it has been more than a month since you have lifted my unheard of, unfair and humiliating bans that I was forced to accept, and I have not made a single contributions to any of those boards, except my own AE case.Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- @Mbz1: A lot of things are unfair. But unfortunately, there is nothing you can do except following WP:FORGIVE and WP:Dead horse. Hodja Nasreddin (talk) 16:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
- I forgave, but the lessons should be learned from this in order to prevent the same unfairness happen to other editors. Wrong actions and unfair blocks should be discussed not to punish somebody, but to learn. --Mbz1 (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)