| Revision as of 23:08, 8 March 2006 editDrichardson (talk | contribs)43 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:40, 9 March 2006 edit undoArbustoo (talk | contribs)12,546 edits vandalismNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I'd rather this page NOT degrade into some disgusting USENET flame war. If anyone reading this doesn't like what I've written here please Remove this post -- don't reply to it. --] 23:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | I'd rather this page NOT degrade into some disgusting USENET flame war. If anyone reading this doesn't like what I've written here please Remove this post -- don't reply to it. --] 23:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| : Vandalism is correct. Please stop removing cited information from the article page. ] 01:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:40, 9 March 2006
Gastrich? Questionable. Harvestdancer 16:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Have no fear! I've been a registered member of wikipedia since 2004. I've made many (minor) anonymous edits, as I have a terrible habbit of not logging in. I have no idea who Gastrich is. My contribution to Arbustoo's talk page was in response to some edits he made to the Oxford Graduate School article. A good friend of mine (Jreichard) (70.60.172.222) typically maintains that article though he didn't create an account until recently. Arbustoo, as far as I can determine, is an unwitting vandal at best and a rabid anti-christian zealot at worst. I've removed his "sock puppet" accusation from my user page as I am no such thing. I also removed the sock-puppet accusation from Jreichard's user page as well. I know him personally. Rest assured, he is certainly not this Gastrich fellow.
I'd rather this page NOT degrade into some disgusting USENET flame war. If anyone reading this doesn't like what I've written here please Remove this post -- don't reply to it. --Drichardson 23:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Vandalism is correct. Please stop removing cited information from the article page. Arbusto 01:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)