Misplaced Pages

User talk:Supreme Deliciousness: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:15, 29 May 2011 view sourceArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,227 edits Topic banned for 6 months: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 23:59, 29 May 2011 view source NULL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,430 edits Striking another user's talk page comments: ReplyNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
Please do not take it upon yourself to strike comments of other editors. If you believe another editor is a sockpuppet, there are appropriate channels you can follow. ] (]) 07:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Please do not take it upon yourself to strike comments of other editors. If you believe another editor is a sockpuppet, there are appropriate channels you can follow. ] (]) 07:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
:I have not deleted or edited legitimate comments. The sock has already been blocked so please do not remove the lines from comments by socks. --] (]) 07:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC) :I have not deleted or edited legitimate comments. The sock has already been blocked so please do not remove the lines from comments by socks. --] (]) 07:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
::My apologies; I did check the user and it didn't show that he was blocked at the time. It does now, though I'm not clear on why it wasn't showing up earlier. In either case, perhaps some edit summaries might have helped explain the reasons for your edits. ] (]) 23:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)


== Topic banned for 6 months == == Topic banned for 6 months ==

Revision as of 23:59, 29 May 2011

/

Archives (Index)



This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Striking another user's talk page comments

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not take it upon yourself to strike comments of other editors. If you believe another editor is a sockpuppet, there are appropriate channels you can follow. TechnoSymbiosis (talk) 07:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

I have not deleted or edited legitimate comments. The sock has already been blocked so please do not remove the lines from comments by socks. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 07:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
My apologies; I did check the user and it didn't show that he was blocked at the time. It does now, though I'm not clear on why it wasn't showing up earlier. In either case, perhaps some edit summaries might have helped explain the reasons for your edits. TechnoSymbiosis (talk) 23:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Topic banned for 6 months

I regret to inform you that, as a result of this request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement, you are prohibited for the next 6 months from editing any page that relates, broadly construed, to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This action is as provided, and logged as required, by Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Discretionary sanctions. AGK 23:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)