Misplaced Pages

Cuban Missile Crisis: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:40, 13 November 2002 edit158.234.10.144 (talk)m Spelling change of "reation" to "reaction"← Previous edit Revision as of 13:46, 18 November 2002 edit undo65.162.192.163 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Cuban missile crisis''' was the, mainly diplomatic, clash between the ] and the ] over the Soviet deployment of ] on ] during thirteen days from ], ],

Since 1959 the Soviet government had accepted that any future war would be largely nuclear, and in that year the ] were founded. The Soviet government became increasingly militaristic in the face of ]'s rearmament program. In response the Soviets decided to install nuclear weapons in Cuba. Their reasoning was two-fold - first, to defend this new Communist state from American or American-sponsored invasion and second, to move the nuclear balance away from the US. The US had recently begun to deploy missiles in ] which threatened European Russia. Soviet technology was well developed in the field of medium-range ballisitic missiles (MRBMs) as opposed to ]s. The Soviets did not believe they could achieve parity in ICBMs before 1970 but saw that a certain kind of equality could be quickly reached by placing missiles on Cuba. Soviet MRBMs on Cuba, with a range of around 1,000 miles, could threaten Washington DC and around half of the ] bases with a flight time of under twenty minutes. In addition, the US radar warning system was orientated towards the USSR and would provide little warning of a launch from Cuba.

] had devised the plan in May 1962 and by late July over sixty Soviet ships were en-route to Cuba with some of them carrying military material. John McCone, director of the ], warned Kennedy that some of the ships were probably carrying missiles but a meeting of John and ], ] and ] decided that the Soviets would not try such a thing.

<table cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="right">
<tr><td>
]
<br>
Picture of one of the Soviet missile sites in Cuba
</td></tr>
</table>

A ] flight in late August photographed a new series of ] missiles sites being constructed, but on September 4 Kennedy told Congress that there were no ''offensive'' missiles on Cuba. On the night of September 8 the first consignment of SS-4 MRBMs was unloaded in ], and a second ship-load arrived on September 16. The Soviets were building nine sites, six for SS-4s and three for longer ranged SS-5s (up to 2,000 miles). The planned arsenal was forty launchers, a increase in Soviet first strike capacity of 70%.

A number of unconnected problems meant that the missiles were not discovered by the Americans until a U-2 flight of October 14 clearly showed the construction of a SS-4 site near ]. By October 19 the then almost continuous U-2 flights showed four sites were operational. Initially the US government kept the information to a circle of the fourteen key officials of the executive committee, ] was not informed until the evening of October 21. The officials discussed the various options - an immediate bombing strike was dismissed early on as was a potentially time consuming appeal to the ]. The choice was reduced to either a naval blockade and a ultimatum or full-scale invasion. A blockade was finally chosen although there were a number of ']s' (notably ], ] and ]) who kept pushing for tougher action and a invasion was planned and troops were assembled in Florida (although with over 40,000 Russian soldiers in Cuba complete with tactical nuclear weapons the proposed invading force would have been in trouble). With the naval blockade there were a number of issues. There was legality - as ] complained there was nothing illegal about the missile installations; they were a threat to the US but similiar missiles aimed at the USSR were in place in Britain, ] and Turkey. Then there was the Soviet reaction to the blockade - would a conflict start out of escalating retaliation?

Kennedy spoke to the US people (and the Soviet government) in a televised address on October 22. He announced the naval blockade as a quarantine zone of 500 miles around the Cuban coast, warned that the military was "prepare for any eventualities", and condemned the Soviet "secrecy and deception". The US was surprised at the solid support from its European allies and also from much of the remaining international community.

The Soviets had delivered two different deals to the American government. One on October 26 offered to withdraw the missiles in return for an US guarantee not to invade Cuba or support any invasion. The second was broadcast on public radio on October 27, calling for the withdrawal of US missiles from Turkey in addition to the demands of the 26th. The crisis peaked on October 27, when a U-2 was shot down over Cuba and another U-2 flight over Russia was almost intercepted. At the same time Soviet merchant ships were nearing the quarantine zone. Kennedy responded by publically accepting the first deal and sending Robert to the Soviet embassy to accept the second in private - the small number of Jupiter missiles in Turkey would be removed. The Soviet ships turned back. "We went eyeball to eyeball, and the other fellow just blinked".

The crisis was a tactical victory for the Soviets but a strategic loss. They had been seen to have backed down and the attempt to gain strategic parity had failed to the anger of the Soviet military commanders. Khushchev's fall from power a few years later can be linked, partially, to his 'failure' to start World War III over Cuba. America military commanders were not happy with the result either, ] told the president that it was "the greatest defeat in our history" and that they should invade today. But the event brought much needed stability to the US-USSR strategic relationship.

''see also ]''

Revision as of 13:46, 18 November 2002