| Revision as of 15:37, 2 June 2011 editN419BH (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,799 edits →There you are: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:01, 6 June 2011 edit undo110.139.190.67 (talk) →There you are: ;Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ...Ever consider just appealing the damn thing to Jimbo? <span style="font-size:smaller;font-family:'arial bold',sans-serif;border:1px solid Black;">]]</span> 15:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | ...Ever consider just appealing the damn thing to Jimbo? <span style="font-size:smaller;font-family:'arial bold',sans-serif;border:1px solid Black;">]]</span> 15:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| : He's not a legitimate authority ;) ] (]) 11:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:01, 6 June 2011
Bradspeak
Thank you, anonymous friend, very much for restoring the fouled-up permalink to Iridescent's page! Bishonen | talk 12:26, 4 May 2011 (UTC).
Template usage
Could you check your usage of cite doi please ? it should be followed by the pipe | and not / resulting in subpages of the template. Shyamal (talk) 08:06, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- It's correct; I've replied on your page. 110.139.190.67 (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
There you are
...Ever consider just appealing the damn thing to Jimbo? N419BH 15:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- He's not a legitimate authority ;) 110.139.190.67 (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)