Revision as of 23:45, 3 June 2011 editNick-D (talk | contribs)Administrators106,130 edits notificaiton | Revision as of 17:06, 6 June 2011 edit undoTimotheus Canens (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators38,430 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Arbitration enforcement== | ==Arbitration enforcement== | ||
I have reported you for not complying with the sanctions imposed on you at: ] ] (]) 23:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC) | I have reported you for not complying with the sanctions imposed on you at: ] ] (]) 23:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
== June 2011 == | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. ] (]) 17:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
:''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' |
Revision as of 17:06, 6 June 2011
Arbitration enforcement
I have reported you for not complying with the sanctions imposed on you at: Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Communicat Nick-D (talk) 23:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. T. Canens (talk) 17:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.