User talk:Incogfrig: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 05:04, 5 June 2011 editIncogfrig (talk \| contribs)26 edits →Welcome ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:40, 5 June 2011 edit undoOrderinchaos (talk \| contribs)Administrators70,076 edits →Welcome: +Next edit →
Line 49:		Line 49:
	] (]) 05:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)		] (]) 05:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
	}}		}}

			: Incogfrig, you picked the wrong discipline to pretend to be - any "political studies lecturer" (hint for next time, it's called "politics" or "political science" depending on the uni) in your city would know or know of me reasonably well (it's not a terribly big field!) and probably have shot me an email at my non-Misplaced Pages address going "what the hell?" Plus I don't know many people on 80 grand a year who edit from IPs which don't resolve but are somewhat traceable (usually a sign of either someone editing from a wireless hotspot - a signature of this other person we used to deal with - or someone trying to obfuscate) and don't write in anything approaching a fluent academic style. I don't need a checkuser - you edited from the IP you're from just before registering your account. ] 05:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:40, 5 June 2011

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Incogfrig, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shrike (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Incogfrig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I put up an entry on one page and this other user is being very rude. Now she has blocked me? This is not very nice especially as there is a conflict of interest. I searched how to appeal this user removing my material. The appeal was lodged with the admin board. But before I can respond I have been blocked? This is not a nice experience. I feel like I am being bullied.

Well, the category is for the individual's religion. She is an atheist. The categories are there to guide the encyclopaedia to provide information to the public. This allows people to reference categories. Particularly relevant in politics. Among a number of things is to allow people to do searches. I found this entry because of listening to the radio and there is a religion in politics debate. I wanted to know who is an atheist in the debate and who is religious. Also Euthanasia is a big issue and as health minister it is good to know what religion she is. It only adds to the encyclopaedia not detracting from it. Look at the entries for politics around the world. Religion is a big thing in Australian politics.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. - Vianello (Talk) 02:29, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Incogfrig, I have enough evidence to conclude that you are the same user as GaryGazza / Bruce99999 / Spotsdoes11, and as such have blocked you indefinitely from editing. Disrupting biographies of living persons, especially when it goes on across multiple accounts over a 4-year time period, is taken very seriously on Misplaced Pages. Please stop wasting your, and our, time.

I'm happy to supply the evidence gathered to admins considering the above unblock request. Orderinchaos 14:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Incogfrig (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I am a new user who was blocked because by a woman called Orderinchaos. From what I have read the user who blocked me says that I am another user called Bruce. The only evidence they have is that I added atheism to someone's religion when it is topical. I also was happy to discuss the issue like it said in the Misplaced Pages help section.

1. *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages* Adding athism to a politions religion is not disrupting the website. In fact, it is very standard in encyclopaedia's to have atheism. I also was very happy to discuss this on the discussion page. Other users also agree with me.

2. *the block is no longer necessary because you

1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Well I have been blocked because user Orderinchaos says that I am someone who edited the website 4 years ago (from what I have read). There was no "check user" no other admin looked into it...this user has based all this on one edit of a webpage (my first ever one!).

The user who is saying I am this other person. Has not presented any proof but more worryingly is bullying me. I have had my messages requesting how to edit in the "new users advice section" deleted and the "fact" that I am a vandal plastered all over every edit and message I made to try to discuss my edit to the webpage. The edit itself is valid.

No-one has stopped to think or at least impartially investigate the issue.

It has made me very upset. I am a political studies lecturer and was excited about editing Misplaced Pages. Instead I have been bullied and banned for no reason. The is absolutely no proof of any of these accusations except I edited a page that was vandalised four years ago! and disagreed with Orderinchaos. Can someone please look at all the things Orderinchaos did to my online reputation and contributions. You will see there is no proof nor impartial investiagation. The edit I made itself was not bad and I was discussing it on the page until I was blocked because without proof Orderinchaos made accusations I was another user.

It is not nice at all to be bullied like this. I could have made a lot of great contributions. But I feel threatened now by Orderinchaos.

Incogfrig (talk) 05:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Hi, I am a new user who was blocked because by a woman called Orderinchaos. From what I have read the user who blocked me says that I am another user called Bruce. The only evidence they have is that I added atheism to someone's religion when it is topical. I also was happy to discuss the issue like it said in the Misplaced Pages help section.
1. *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages* Adding athism to a politions religion is not disrupting the website. In fact, it is very standard in encyclopaedia's to have atheism. I also was very happy to discuss this on the discussion page. Other users also agree with me.
2. *the block is no longer necessary because you
*#understand what you have been blocked for,
*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
*#will make useful contributions instead.
Well I have been blocked because user Orderinchaos says that I am someone who edited the website 4 years ago (from what I have read). There was no "check user" no other admin looked into it...this user has based all this on one edit of a webpage (my first ever one!).
The user who is saying I am this other person. Has not presented any proof but more worryingly is bullying me. I have had my messages requesting how to edit in the "new users advice section" deleted and the "fact" that I am a vandal plastered all over every edit and message I made to try to discuss my edit to the webpage. The edit itself is valid.
No-one has stopped to think or at least impartially investigate the issue.
It has made me very upset. I am a political studies lecturer and was excited about editing Misplaced Pages. Instead I have been bullied and banned for no reason. The is absolutely no proof of any of these accusations except I edited a page that was vandalised four years ago! and disagreed with Orderinchaos. Can someone please look at all the things Orderinchaos did to my online reputation and contributions. You will see there is no proof nor impartial investiagation. The edit I made itself was not bad and I was discussing it on the page until I was blocked because without proof Orderinchaos made accusations I was another user. 
It is not nice at all to be bullied like this. I could have made a lot of great contributions. But I feel threatened now by Orderinchaos. 
] (]) 05:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Hi, I am a new user who was blocked because by a woman called Orderinchaos. From what I have read the user who blocked me says that I am another user called Bruce. The only evidence they have is that I added atheism to someone's religion when it is topical. I also was happy to discuss the issue like it said in the Misplaced Pages help section.
1. *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages* Adding athism to a politions religion is not disrupting the website. In fact, it is very standard in encyclopaedia's to have atheism. I also was very happy to discuss this on the discussion page. Other users also agree with me.
2. *the block is no longer necessary because you
*#understand what you have been blocked for,
*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
*#will make useful contributions instead.
Well I have been blocked because user Orderinchaos says that I am someone who edited the website 4 years ago (from what I have read). There was no "check user" no other admin looked into it...this user has based all this on one edit of a webpage (my first ever one!).
The user who is saying I am this other person. Has not presented any proof but more worryingly is bullying me. I have had my messages requesting how to edit in the "new users advice section" deleted and the "fact" that I am a vandal plastered all over every edit and message I made to try to discuss my edit to the webpage. The edit itself is valid.
No-one has stopped to think or at least impartially investigate the issue.
It has made me very upset. I am a political studies lecturer and was excited about editing Misplaced Pages. Instead I have been bullied and banned for no reason. The is absolutely no proof of any of these accusations except I edited a page that was vandalised four years ago! and disagreed with Orderinchaos. Can someone please look at all the things Orderinchaos did to my online reputation and contributions. You will see there is no proof nor impartial investiagation. The edit I made itself was not bad and I was discussing it on the page until I was blocked because without proof Orderinchaos made accusations I was another user. 
It is not nice at all to be bullied like this. I could have made a lot of great contributions. But I feel threatened now by Orderinchaos. 
] (]) 05:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Hi, I am a new user who was blocked because by a woman called Orderinchaos. From what I have read the user who blocked me says that I am another user called Bruce. The only evidence they have is that I added atheism to someone's religion when it is topical. I also was happy to discuss the issue like it said in the Misplaced Pages help section.
1. *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages* Adding athism to a politions religion is not disrupting the website. In fact, it is very standard in encyclopaedia's to have atheism. I also was very happy to discuss this on the discussion page. Other users also agree with me.
2. *the block is no longer necessary because you
*#understand what you have been blocked for,
*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
*#will make useful contributions instead.
Well I have been blocked because user Orderinchaos says that I am someone who edited the website 4 years ago (from what I have read). There was no "check user" no other admin looked into it...this user has based all this on one edit of a webpage (my first ever one!).
The user who is saying I am this other person. Has not presented any proof but more worryingly is bullying me. I have had my messages requesting how to edit in the "new users advice section" deleted and the "fact" that I am a vandal plastered all over every edit and message I made to try to discuss my edit to the webpage. The edit itself is valid.
No-one has stopped to think or at least impartially investigate the issue.
It has made me very upset. I am a political studies lecturer and was excited about editing Misplaced Pages. Instead I have been bullied and banned for no reason. The is absolutely no proof of any of these accusations except I edited a page that was vandalised four years ago! and disagreed with Orderinchaos. Can someone please look at all the things Orderinchaos did to my online reputation and contributions. You will see there is no proof nor impartial investiagation. The edit I made itself was not bad and I was discussing it on the page until I was blocked because without proof Orderinchaos made accusations I was another user. 
It is not nice at all to be bullied like this. I could have made a lot of great contributions. But I feel threatened now by Orderinchaos. 
] (]) 05:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Incogfrig, you picked the wrong discipline to pretend to be - any "political studies lecturer" (hint for next time, it's called "politics" or "political science" depending on the uni) in your city would know or know of me reasonably well (it's not a terribly big field!) and probably have shot me an email at my non-Misplaced Pages address going "what the hell?" Plus I don't know many people on 80 grand a year who edit from IPs which don't resolve but are somewhat traceable (usually a sign of either someone editing from a wireless hotspot - a signature of this other person we used to deal with - or someone trying to obfuscate) and don't write in anything approaching a fluent academic style. I don't need a checkuser - you edited from the IP you're from just before registering your account. Orderinchaos 05:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Category:

Requests for unblock