Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:31, 18 March 2006

Traditional evolutionists have occasionally linked the Black race's similarities to apes to being at a 'lesser' evoultionary state or level than White people. At one point, museums even contained evolutionary charts in which it showed apes evolving to Homo erectus, to neanderthal, to blacks, to whites.

This is actually based on incorrect traditional beliefs about how humans evolved and came about.

The fact is, and this will be mainstream knowledge within the next 30 years, I would estimate, humans were originally blonde haired and blue eyes, with some red haired and green eyed people. This was actually in a totally different star system, which no longer exists, in the direction of Lyrae. They were not descended from apes. They contained dolphin DNA, and were upright semi-aquatic mammals.

The Black race were created much later on Earth by combining the upgraded genetics of apes, particularly chimpanzees and gorillas, with blonde-haired and red-haired white humans, as well as the genetics of their creators, an amphibian quasi-reptilian race called the Abbennakki. Loius Farrakhan has even talked about this, due to encounters with the Abbennakki in the mid 1990s.

In Sumer, because the original inhabitants of the region were a Negroid race that was conquered by a white race (The Aryans), the Negroids became slaves in the Sumerian caste hierarchy. These people, despite being slaves, had their own culture, system of writing, language, and long history. This same history is essentially recounted by Sub-Saharan tribes like the Zulu and Watutsi.

They called themselves the Sag-Gi-Ga, or the Black-Headed people. They spoke of how their creators were a group of gods called the Anunnaki (Abbennakki), that made them by combining the blood of apes and men (genetic engineering). This is partially where the story of Enkidu came from. Enki was said to be the chief geneticist of these gods. Zecharia Sitchin has mistranslated the tablets. They actually recount the creation of the Black race, the Sag-Gi-Ga, not the Sumerians, who were a mixture of white, semitic, and Elamo-Dravidian peoples.

They stated that the Abbennakki would one day return to avenge them, and take them to Nibiru, an artificial planetoid, where they would be saved from the tyranny of the Sum-Aryans.

Unfortunately, the Abbennakki have been deterred from the Earth by the United States government. This was in the summer of 2003, when Nibiru was visible in the night sky, as reported in Newsweek and the New York Times.

That's about the dumbest stuff I've heard in a while. W-aaay outside. deeceevoice 20:13, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Is this guy SERIOUS?????

Yeah, this takes a giant stab at wikipedia's credibility.... Damien Vryce 18:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

So Jay Leno's Negroid?

This is bull. --Vehgah 06:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

LOL

Are you on drugs?

What the hell is this? Since when does this kind of bizzare stuff make it into an "encyclopedia". My kids use this website at school. Hardly quality academic reading!

How on earth did "prognathism" become defined here as pathological?

This article started out as something reasonable. It very clearly stated that prognathism is a tell-tale phenotypical trait of Africoid peoples. Now I return to find the flat profiles (of whites) defined as "normal" -- meaning, I suppose, that the majority of humankind (black people in Africa, Australia, New Guinea, the Indian subcontinent -- and a whole lot of Asians -- including a lot of Latinos) are abnormal. So, whites are "normal," and a good chunk of the majority of humankind is implicity "abnormal"? I have to believe this was deliberate, given the information already provided to the contrary. It stinks of racism. I've made the changes. It may not be perfect, but at least it's accurate. deeceevoice 19:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Prognathism is least in Mongoloids, not Caucasoids

The article was wrong, prognathism should be least in Mongoloids, not Caucasoids. Caucasoids like in most biometric results lie between Negroids (Africoids) and Mongoloids. I added the classic human skull diagrams of all three races for comparison (appropriate considering the use of prognathism in determining race). Mongoloids are not stereotyped of having a "flat face" for nothing.

Yes, absolutely correct. I'm not sure which language you're referring to, but I realize that I may have referred to prognathism in "Mongoloids," while thinking "Asians" (as in Southeast Asians). Genetically more Asian than African, some blacks in Southeast Asia and, actually, nonblack ("Mongoloid"), but often dark-skinned, Asians of places like Indonesia and Cambodia, for example, do, indeed, have facial prognathisms). But, then, there are acknowledged faciocranial differences between these (sundadont) populations, who are more noticeably mixed with the aboriginal Negritos of the region, and the (sinodont) Asians of the Far East. If that was my error, sorry for my mental glitch.

Someone added that maxillary prognathism was common in Caucasians, when it most assuredly is not. The feature pointed to is not considered prognathism. In the Caucasoid rendering, a virtual plumb line can be drawn from the bridge of the nose through the root of the nose at the top of the upper lip, through to the chin (make an upward extension to the bridge of the nose of line a in the "zygomatics" a-b line). This is the flat Caucasoid aspect that does not evidence maxillary prognathism -- not the point where the upper teeth are. I've removed it from the sentence. Deeceevoice 08:09, 14 March 2006 (UTC)