Revision as of 22:19, 4 July 2011 editHuskyHuskie (talk | contribs)6,963 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:05, 13 July 2011 edit undoMann jess (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,672 edits →Completely new abortion proposal and mediation: TalkbackNext edit → | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
To avoid concerns that this notice might violate ], this posting is being made to '''every''' non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. ] (]) 22:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC) | To avoid concerns that this notice might violate ], this posting is being made to '''every''' non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. ] (]) 22:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
{{tb|Mann_jess}} — ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">· ]]</span> 21:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:05, 13 July 2011
Welcome!
Hello, ArtifexMayhem, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Abortion
Aristotle? Well, that's got to be the least controversial edit ever done to the article. OrangeMarlin 04:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- I figured I should put something down before I ripped out that unsourced, factually wrong, Hippocratic Oath bit of fucking insane propaganda and replaced it with reality. That will be more interesting :) Nice Marlin karma btw. ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- I was just coming here to thank you for catching that one.
- Meanwhile, there's a bit of Leviticus or Deuteronomy that says, roughly, that if you beat a woman to death, you shall be put to death. (That happens a lot in those books.) However, if you beat her just enough that she has a miscarriage, you just have to give her husband some money. So much for the value of fetuses. I'll try to find some non-OR way to work it in after the forthcoming Hippocrates brouhaha. PhGustaf (talk) 04:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- I also like this bit...."In the 20th century the Soviet Union (1919), Iceland (1935) and Sweden (1938)....legalize certain or all forms of abortion. In 1935 Nazi Germany..."
- Can you find the two red herrings? ArtifexMayhem (talk) 06:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Poking around, I see that Judaism and abortion already quotes Exodus 21:22-23. Not sure whether that would fit in the top article, but I'll think about it. PhGustaf (talk) 06:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Administrators' noticeboard : Abortion lead sentence - straw poll consensus
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - RoyBoy 22:05, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
A shiney red apple for your gallant white steed
It was quite a surprise to see you ride in on your beautiful white horse Tonto. Our new Misplaced Pages member doesn't give a rats ass about improving the Misplaced Pages chemicals section. He is here for one reason only and that is to erase any mention of this incident. That Misplaced Pages should allow the EPA to set up an account wherein the EPA can recruit established members to carry out the edits they suggest since it may be seen as COI on their part, what the hell? If the EPA is going to stoop to that tactic, what's to stop them from suggesting to employees to join up as well, read their to-do list, and edit away... Sucks. Gandydancer (talk) 22:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the apple :) Hehe. They will back off when they figure out what Misplaced Pages is about and how it works (for better or worse). Are you familiar with the hows and whys of the EPA and/or how civilian agencies generally function in the US? If not let me know and I'll try, briefly, explaining the beast. You might find these EPA policy guidlines worth a once over Guidance:Representing EPA Online Using Social Media. Tasty apple :) -- ArtifexMayhem (talk) 23:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link; it is interesting and informative. I'm not sure what you mean when you ask if I'm familiar with the hows and whys of the EPA and/or how civilian agencies generally function in the US. I'd like to hear your viewpoint. Gandydancer (talk) 11:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- A carrot for Tonto and a nice shot of whiskey for you. You saved the day. I was furious! I was typing away at a long rant and then as I went to post I saw your note. That will do just fine. BTW, my horse's name is Trigger and I'm beginning to think that James is a horse's ass. :) Gandydancer (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'm glad you saw my post first. I could hear the steam whistling out of your ears.
- He has now used his one free clue. We'll see if he gets it. Rats. While I was typing Tonto drank my whiskey. Guess I'll breakout the Tequila. - ArtifexMayhem (talk) 23:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
Non-free files in your user space
Hey there ArtifexMayhem, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User talk:ArtifexMayhem. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Completely new abortion proposal and mediation
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.
The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.
To avoid concerns that this notice might violate WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page (or either page's respective talk page) since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 22:19, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, ArtifexMayhem. You have new messages at Mann jess's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.