| Revision as of 16:34, 9 July 2011 editOtberg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users765 edits →Deletion of: Kingdom of Araucanía and Patagonia← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:25, 10 July 2011 edit undoBeyond My Ken (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers263,279 edits →My apology for my error: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ]. | ||
| Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> --] (]) 16:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC) | Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's ], please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> --] (]) 16:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == My apology for my error == | |||
| Diego Gez, I'd like to offer you my apology for stating on AN/I that you are still under restrictions because I totally misread the last discussion on the topic on AN. As an editor free of all restrictions, you are, of course, entitled to bring problems to AN/I, although I continue to think this particular one is a content dispute which should be dealt with on the article's talk page. That is, however, irrelevant to my error, for which I beg your pardon. Best, ] (]) 22:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:25, 10 July 2011
User:Diego Grez/Navbar User:Diego Grez/Chile User:Diego Grez/format
.jpeg){kind=small} | Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers. |
| vn-1 | This editor's user page, talk page, or subpages have been vandalized 1 time. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 |
Please leave a new message. I answer posts on the same page. |
Deletion of
You proposed that Guy-Greenbrier earthquake swarm be deleted. This is a sourced article and an on-going event. A Google search finds numerous sources that could be included. I'm curious why this considered an uncontroversial deletion? If you thought that it was non-notable — despite the article passing the usual Google search litmus tests — why not initiate a discussion on the talk page first to allow a few days for editors to respond? The deletion process has become perhaps the most off-putting aspect of Misplaced Pages to new editors. I've been around here for a while so a proposed deletion of my articles, like this one, doesn't phase me. But if this article had been created by a new editor, it certainly would have contributed to the harmful and popular idea that Misplaced Pages is controlled by a few editors and perhaps resulted in that new editor not contributing further. People at the Strategy Wiki keep wondering about editor retention and keep assuming that a gender bias, blah blah blash, is the reason all the while ignoring obvious problems like deletionism. Please keep in mind Misplaced Pages:NOTPAPER. Having articles on smaller topics doesn't hurt anything. Jason Quinn (talk) 07:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Kingdom of Araucanía and Patagonia
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Otberg (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
My apology for my error
Diego Gez, I'd like to offer you my apology for stating on AN/I that you are still under restrictions because I totally misread the last discussion on the topic on AN. As an editor free of all restrictions, you are, of course, entitled to bring problems to AN/I, although I continue to think this particular one is a content dispute which should be dealt with on the article's talk page. That is, however, irrelevant to my error, for which I beg your pardon. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)