Misplaced Pages

User talk:Oda Mari: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:04, 19 July 2011 editEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 edits →PRO-WIKIPEDIA: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 18:12, 19 July 2011 edit undoEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 edits →Pro-Misplaced Pages: tweakingNext edit →
Line 28: Line 28:
Thank you for helping me to parse and evaluate a trivial problem. --] (]) 14:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC) Thank you for helping me to parse and evaluate a trivial problem. --] (]) 14:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


==PRO-WIKIPEDIA== ==Pro-Misplaced Pages==
⚫ I propose a strategy to combat the contrived appearance of an ] by using words like this in all future edit summaries at ] and ]:
⚫ Please notice this pair of edits at ]:
⚫ ::''This is a "PRO-WIKIPEDIA" edit. This edit is explained in detail and in advance on talk page''

⚫ Please consider this pair of edits at ]:
# 17:35, 19 July 2011 Tenmei (talk | contribs) (58,318 bytes) (''Undid revision 440335859 by Lvhis pro-Misplaced Pages -- This revert explained in detail and in advance on talk page'') # 17:35, 19 July 2011 Tenmei (talk | contribs) (58,318 bytes) (''Undid revision 440335859 by Lvhis pro-Misplaced Pages -- This revert explained in detail and in advance on talk page'')
# 16:55, 19 July 2011 Lvhis (talk | contribs) (58,346 bytes) (''Reverted 1 edit by Oda Mari (talk): This is a POV title. rv Japanese POV pushing. (TW)'') # 16:55, 19 July 2011 Lvhis (talk | contribs) (58,346 bytes) (''Reverted 1 edit by Oda Mari (talk): This is a POV title. rv Japanese POV pushing. (TW)'')
Line 37: Line 40:
Lvhis sets up a misleading pro vs con ]. Lvhis sets up a misleading pro vs con ].


A better strategy is to emphasize a "pro-Misplaced Pages" foundation -- that is, to underscore that our edits are not A better strategy is to emphasize a "pro-Misplaced Pages" foundation -- that is, to underscore that our edits are <u>not</u>
{{col-begin}} {{col-begin}}
{{col-3}} {{col-3}}
* pro-Japan or anti-Japan? *pro-Japan nor anti-Japan
{{col-3}} {{col-3}}
* pro-PRC nor anti-PRC? *pro-PRC nor anti-PRC
{{col-3}} {{col-3}}
* pro-ROC nor anti-ROC? *pro-ROC nor anti-ROC
{{col-end}} {{col-end}}


Line 51: Line 54:
For us, the first and foremost question is: What is best for the long-term prospects of our ] project? For us, the first and foremost question is: What is best for the long-term prospects of our ] project?


⚫ What do you think? --] (]) 18:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
⚫ I propose that you we counter the contrived appearance of an edit war by using words like this in all future edit summaries at ] and ]:
⚫ ::''This is a "PRO-WIKIPEDIA" edit. This edit is explained in detail and in advance on talk page''

⚫ What do you think? --] (]) 18:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:12, 19 July 2011

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

This is Oda Mari's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 14 days 

Talkback: Nils von Barth – Kanji

Hello, Oda Mari. You have new messages at Nbarth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cognitive bias

Perhaps you may have read ja:認知バイアス. At Note2 In that article, please consider this very small point:

一部の認知バイアスは主体の「動機づけ」を反映している

The concept is treated superficially in a stub article Motivated reasoning. Over the next couple of weeks, I will try to improve the quality of the writing.

I know that this is outside your normal editing area, but it may have a practical use.

Please watchlist this article. Do you have any suggestions to offer? --Tenmei (talk) 18:38, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Sakoku

Thanks for rolling that back. Needed doing. Yunshui (talk) 19:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank You for Your Remind

Or I would continue spending time doing wrong jobs....Heinrich ⅩⅦ von Bayern (talk) 15:12, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Template:Japan Old Province

Thank you for helping me to parse and evaluate a trivial problem. --Tenmei (talk) 14:36, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Pro-Misplaced Pages

I propose a strategy to combat the contrived appearance of an WP:edit war by using words like this in all future edit summaries at Senkaku Islands and Senkaku Islands dispute:

This is a "PRO-WIKIPEDIA" edit. This edit is explained in detail and in advance on talk page

Please consider this pair of edits at Senkaku Islands dispute:

  1. diff 17:35, 19 July 2011 Tenmei (talk | contribs) (58,318 bytes) (Undid revision 440335859 by Lvhis pro-Misplaced Pages -- This revert explained in detail and in advance on talk page)
  2. diff 16:55, 19 July 2011 Lvhis (talk | contribs) (58,346 bytes) (Reverted 1 edit by Oda Mari (talk): This is a POV title. rv Japanese POV pushing. (TW))

The edit summary of Lvhis is an example of Framing (social science). We need to reject the false dilemma. Do you understand the meaning of the logical fallacy in a "false dilemma"?

Lvhis sets up a misleading pro vs con schema.

A better strategy is to emphasize a "pro-Misplaced Pages" foundation -- that is, to underscore that our edits are not

  • pro-Japan nor anti-Japan
  • pro-PRC nor anti-PRC
  • pro-ROC nor anti-ROC

In point of fact, an extensive edit history informs my belief that Oda Mari's interests are demonstrably "pro-Misplaced Pages" ....

For us, the first and foremost question is: What is best for the long-term prospects of our collaborative editing project?

What do you think? --Tenmei (talk) 18:12, 19 July 2011 (UTC)