Misplaced Pages

User talk:DegenFarang: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:06, 28 July 2011 editDegenFarang (talk | contribs)2,116 edits →question: formatting← Previous edit Revision as of 10:09, 28 July 2011 edit undoCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits →question: noteNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


:What led us here was me attempting to do things the right way. I sought intervention to prevent an edit war. I made a mistake in that process, one which I will not repeat, but will continue attempting to solve any problems through the appropriate channels while staying within the rules. ] (]) 08:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC) :What led us here was me attempting to do things the right way. I sought intervention to prevent an edit war. I made a mistake in that process, one which I will not repeat, but will continue attempting to solve any problems through the appropriate channels while staying within the rules. ] (]) 08:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

::Ok Degen but please remember that posts to other users' talk pages like these are not appropriate & cannot be tolerated. <br>I'm unblocking you based upon your response above. Please try to disengage from the poker disputes for a while attempt ] in order to find common ground with others--] <sup>]</sup> 10:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:09, 28 July 2011

July 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for For breaching guidelines on wikipedia's policy of conflict of interest breaching WP:OUTING. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Cailil 12:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DegenFarang (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see now that what I did violates the rules and I apologize as I was not aware accusing somebody of editing their own article was not allowed.

Decline reason:

Awaiting reply to Cailil's question below. Please post a new unblock request with your response. This isn't exactly a refusal to unblock you, I'm just removing this to clear the backlog since we're waiting for your reply anyway. Hersfold 19:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

,

It's not "permanent", it's indefinite. You'll need to convice someone that the block is no longer needed to prevent further problems. Your statement above, along with the "IAR" paragraph at the top of the page, do little to convince. (Note: statement above was altered by DegenFarang after this comment). Kuru (talk) 16:07, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Alright I removed the IAR section. I see now that I broke a rule in saying what I said. I was not aware at the time this was a rule. I apologize for doing it and will not do it again. I request that the block be removed. DegenFarang (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

question

User:DegenFarang back in January 2010 I warned you for disruptive editing in relation to Poker BLPs as did Vassyana. This instance (on the 26th of July) shows a repeat and escalation of that behaviour. If we are to unblock you, how will you adjust your behaviour on wikipedia to come into line with with all of our core policies and guidelines for content & behaviour?--Cailil 16:39, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

I will not knowingly violate any guidelines or policies and when made aware of policies I have violated I will cease to repeat whatever I did. The IAR statement at the top of this page was put there a long time ago and does not represent my current outlook on being an editor and I wont restore it.
What led us here was me attempting to do things the right way. I sought intervention to prevent an edit war. I made a mistake in that process, one which I will not repeat, but will continue attempting to solve any problems through the appropriate channels while staying within the rules. DegenFarang (talk) 08:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Ok Degen but please remember that posts to other users' talk pages like these are not appropriate & cannot be tolerated.
I'm unblocking you based upon your response above. Please try to disengage from the poker disputes for a while attempt dispute resolution in order to find common ground with others--Cailil 10:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)