Revision as of 22:10, 10 August 2011 editBinksternet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers494,034 edits banner← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:11, 10 August 2011 edit undoBinksternet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers494,034 edits →Image of the advertisement: yesNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I have ProQuest access, so I can get an image of the ad. It's obviously not public domain, but does it add to readers' understanding of the topic (justifying a fair-use rationale)? Or is it only the text, rather than the structure, layout etc., that is significant? ] (] ⋅ ]) 21:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC) | I have ProQuest access, so I can get an image of the ad. It's obviously not public domain, but does it add to readers' understanding of the topic (justifying a fair-use rationale)? Or is it only the text, rather than the structure, layout etc., that is significant? ] (] ⋅ ]) 21:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I think it would be very helpful to see the page as a fair-use image. ] (]) 22:11, 10 August 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:11, 10 August 2011
This article and its editors are subject to Misplaced Pages general sanctions. Imposed by community discussion here. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Image of the advertisement
I have ProQuest access, so I can get an image of the ad. It's obviously not public domain, but does it add to readers' understanding of the topic (justifying a fair-use rationale)? Or is it only the text, rather than the structure, layout etc., that is significant? Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think it would be very helpful to see the page as a fair-use image. Binksternet (talk) 22:11, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages articles under general sanctions
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Abortion articles
- Unknown-importance Abortion articles
- WikiProject Abortion articles
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- Start-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Start-Class Human rights articles
- Low-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- Start-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- Start-Class Feminism articles
- Low-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- Unassessed United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Unassessed United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed United States Government articles
- Unknown-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles