| Revision as of 01:32, 20 August 2011 editCerejota (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,178 edits →List of ...: editing← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:17, 20 August 2011 edit undoYendor1152 (talk | contribs)200 edits →List of ...Next edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| I have been editing at ], feel free do work there. I began with the bottom of the "scientists" part, eliminated those names without bios at this point (we can later add as ] if needed, and making choices about what images to leave or take out based on relative notability. Please leave the prose parts so I can copy that as a basis for a future article. --] (]) 01:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC) | I have been editing at ], feel free do work there. I began with the bottom of the "scientists" part, eliminated those names without bios at this point (we can later add as ] if needed, and making choices about what images to leave or take out based on relative notability. Please leave the prose parts so I can copy that as a basis for a future article. --] (]) 01:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| Could you please tell me why you keep eliminating a fact from the Steve Reeves entry? I conducted an interview with Reeves that is in the current issue of Films of the Golden Age magazine. I posted this information, and you've consistently removed it. Why? | |||
Revision as of 17:17, 20 August 2011
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Your beef with the marine
Why don't you drop it? Its boring and nothing positive comes out of it. You a good editor, but having such a vendetta is not pretty. Bury the hatchet and move along... --Cerejota (talk) 14:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- You have a wrong interpretation of the events. It's hard to work on Puerto Rico related articles without stepping on his toes, but I would say we're getting along smoothly lately. --damiens.rf 14:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well, he is a well respected founding member of WikiProject Puerto Rico, so it is understandable for you to run into him. If you want things to go "smoother" engage the community, like joining the project or at the very least seek our opinions. I will say that more often than not, he reflects the consensus of the project, and has our support. This doesn't mean that WP:CCC, but it can hardly be considered changed solely on your views.--Cerejota (talk) 15:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have a hard time understanding your messages. I did not say I wanted "things to go "smoother"", I said things ARE going smoothly. More than often, he reflects the consensus of the project, but more than often, he fails to follow site wide consensus (called polices). When he does that he's usually acting in good faith, and he wouldn't deny you that even his work is not perfect. I don't get why you doing such a drama out of this. As I said, we're getting along. --damiens.rf 15:26, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Just try not to got forum shopping in the future... nothing is lost by asking directly. --Cerejota (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- I haven't seen any forum shopping. What I saw was Damiens raising a valid issue, and two editors rushing in to attack him. It's getting old, as are Marine's serial errors in judgment. ScottyBerg (talk) 17:19, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Just try not to got forum shopping in the future... nothing is lost by asking directly. --Cerejota (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have a hard time understanding your messages. I did not say I wanted "things to go "smoother"", I said things ARE going smoothly. More than often, he reflects the consensus of the project, but more than often, he fails to follow site wide consensus (called polices). When he does that he's usually acting in good faith, and he wouldn't deny you that even his work is not perfect. I don't get why you doing such a drama out of this. As I said, we're getting along. --damiens.rf 15:26, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well, he is a well respected founding member of WikiProject Puerto Rico, so it is understandable for you to run into him. If you want things to go "smoother" engage the community, like joining the project or at the very least seek our opinions. I will say that more often than not, he reflects the consensus of the project, and has our support. This doesn't mean that WP:CCC, but it can hardly be considered changed solely on your views.--Cerejota (talk) 15:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Damiens.rf. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette assistance regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
If it was not clear.--Cerejota (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
List of ...
I like your suggestion on modeling the "List of PR scientists" on the "List of Russian Scientists. I think that I can work with that this weekend once the deletion nom. is closed. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- That would work great. --damiens.rf 20:31, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I have been editing at User:Cerejota/List_of_Puerto_Rican_scientists_and_inventors-newversion, feel free do work there. I began with the bottom of the "scientists" part, eliminated those names without bios at this point (we can later add as red links if needed, and making choices about what images to leave or take out based on relative notability. Please leave the prose parts so I can copy that as a basis for a future article. --Cerejota (talk) 01:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Could you please tell me why you keep eliminating a fact from the Steve Reeves entry? I conducted an interview with Reeves that is in the current issue of Films of the Golden Age magazine. I posted this information, and you've consistently removed it. Why?