| Revision as of 20:15, 21 August 2011 view sourceDeirdreAnne (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,821 editsm →August 2011: sp← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:46, 22 August 2011 view source Supreme Deliciousness (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,580 edits →August 2011Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' for '''two weeks''' from editing because of your ] at ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ]<sup>(] <small>•</small> ])</sup> 19:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Uw-deoablock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' for '''two weeks''' from editing because of your ] at ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ]<sup>(] <small>•</small> ])</sup> 19:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:Uw-deoablock --> | ||
| *If you wished to be unblocked I expect that you will agree to either drop this issue OR take it to ]; there is no point to continuing to harass AGK after they have explained the situation and your comments to ] telling him that this was none of his business shows a complete lack of understanding of the principles of Misplaced Pages.--]<sup>(] <small>•</small> ])</sup> 19:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC) | *If you wished to be unblocked I expect that you will agree to either drop this issue OR take it to ]; there is no point to continuing to harass AGK after they have explained the situation and your comments to ] telling him that this was none of his business shows a complete lack of understanding of the principles of Misplaced Pages.--]<sup>(] <small>•</small> ])</sup> 19:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::I haven't harassed anyone. AGK told me that were were going to have the discussion, I gave him reply that he hasn't answered to, he hasn't given any explanation for why he hasn't replied to me. Is this appropriate for an admin who hands out a half a year topic ban to someone? That is only further evidence that he is an illegitimate admin who cant even explain his own bogus topic bans he hands out. He is abusing his admin privileges and you are letting him get away with it. --] (]) 12:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:46, 22 August 2011
/
Enough
I have been watching AGK's talk page for the last three months, and your continuous postings to his talk page are getting tiresome. He has explained his reasons for the topic ban numerous times, both at Arbitration Enforcement as well as your talk page and on his talk page, and continuously posting to his talk page about it is not the appropriate avenue to appeal. If you wish to appeal your six month topic ban, you may do so by appealing to the Arbitration Committee at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment or by emailing arbcom-l
lists.wikimedia.org. Further posts to AGK's talk page may lead to an interaction ban. Steven Zhang 10:35, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Doug. 19:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- If you wished to be unblocked I expect that you will agree to either drop this issue OR take it to WP:ARBCOM; there is no point to continuing to harass AGK after they have explained the situation and your comments to User:Steven Zhang telling him that this was none of his business shows a complete lack of understanding of the principles of Misplaced Pages.--Doug. 19:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- I haven't harassed anyone. AGK told me that were were going to have the discussion, I gave him reply that he hasn't answered to, he hasn't given any explanation for why he hasn't replied to me. Is this appropriate for an admin who hands out a half a year topic ban to someone? That is only further evidence that he is an illegitimate admin who cant even explain his own bogus topic bans he hands out. He is abusing his admin privileges and you are letting him get away with it. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 12:46, 22 August 2011 (UTC)