Misplaced Pages

User:Ciriii: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:00, 20 March 2006 editCiriii (talk | contribs)426 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:19, 1 May 2006 edit undoCiriii (talk | contribs)426 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
I TEND TO RAMBLE! I TEND TO RAMBLE!



''Statement of WIKIness 1''


'''EDIT DON'T REVERT''' '''EDIT DON'T REVERT'''
I will never ] a page that has been edited in ]. If someone has something to say, even if 99% of the populace disagree it probably is still relevant. This is where there is no consensus between wikepedians: I will never ] a page that has been edited in ]. If someone has something to say, even if 99% of the populace disagree it probably is still relevant. This is where there is no consensus between wikepedians:


] vs. ] : Actually Wikepedia's policy on Neutrality is rather contradictory to itself and can be read in two ways. 1) Avoid any opinions and include only published ] 2} Include all fact, and represent all ]. Since there is no way to decide which facts are correct, the second one seems logical, and unlike other encyclopaedias this one has the added bonus of a discussions page where you can often see nationaliStic, local or egoistic pride shine! And whence form an objective view. What a bonus, eh?! ] vs. ] : Actually Wikepedia's policy on Neutrality is rather contradictory to itself and can be read in two ways. 1) Avoid any opinions and include only published ] 2} Include all fact, and represent all ]. Since there is no way to decide which facts are correct and which are mere opinions, the second one seems logical, and unlike other encyclopaedias this one has the added bonus of a discussions page where you can often see nationalistic, local or egoistic pride shine! And form an objective view of your own.


I am unlikely to revert first time ] on a userpage. Editing, '''NOT''' reverting, is always the best way! I bet you can find something worthy in every edit...look hard! Otherwise those trying to ]...will eventually give in! What is the point in constant reverts, a revert ]...only one ] being promulgated! That is not objectivity, nor beneficial. '''Editing, '''NOT''' reverting''', is usually the bst way when a big addition has taken place. I bet you can find something worthy in every edit...look hard! Otherwise those trying to ]...will eventually give in! What is the point in constant reverts, a revert ]...only one ] being promulgated! That is not objectivity, nor beneficial.


---- ----


''Statement of WIKIness 2''


'''NATIONALISTIC PRIDE IN ARTICLES IS DAFT''' '''NATIONALISTIC PRIDE IN ARTICLES IS DAFT'''
Encyclopaedic ] is increasing. More and more ] pages contain rivalries, especially over history. I'm not naming names but I'm sorry..there are some areas in history that are accepted as fact by scholars and governments, no matter what the old wives tales say..you can if you so wish revise history into a nationalist mould, however, the ] forces didn't win at ], The ] didn't ultimitely become a galactic force and ] doesn't rule the world!! No matter what the old wives tales say..you cannot change historical fact, even with revisionism, the ] forces didn't win at ], Germany did win ], The ] didn't ultimitely become a galactic force and ] doesn't rule the world!!
You cannot dismiss someone becuase of their birthplace.
It is really egotistical to dismiss somebody's ] because it is based on a different national school of thought than your own, equally it is not productive to edit an article brutally to your way of thinking. A compromise should be reached to provide the best of both views. You cannot dismiss someone becuase of their birthplace.
{{user United Kingdom}}{{user British English}}{{user England}}{{User Proud English}}{{userbox|blue|yellow|derbyshire|This user is from ], "The ]"}} {{user United Kingdom}}{{user British English}}{{user England}}{{User Proud English}}{{userbox|blue|yellow|derbyshire|This user is from ], "The ]"}}


---- ----


My name's Christopher.
⚫ I have a ] in ], specialising in ] ] and ] from about ] to ] and classical theological history. I have a real interest in pure ] and ] too. These are all pretty intermingled though.


My religious beliefs don't easily fit anywhere. I believe all the Gods are as important as eachother, but i am not ]. I worship whichever ], from whichever ], seems appropriate at the time. I also believe in the ] religions, Viewing ], ] and ] as distinct entitities, but ultimitely superior to the other Gods, which they created. (everyone needs a helping hand, right?) For me The ] ], ] and ] are equally as important, but only as teachers. I would consider myslef closer to a mix of ] than other christianities.
Welcome matey!. If you are through that rambling at the top, and made it here, heres a warm ], and a seat by the ].! My name's Christopher, call me that or Ciriii
⚫ I have a ] in ], specialising in ] ] and ] history over a fairly broad period. I have a real interest in ] and ] too. thgese are all pretty intermingled though. I know a fair few languages, and a few that aren't listed on ], though they are mostly dead now, and my translation skills may not be required!





'''''This week's Recommended page:''''' '''''This week's Recommended page:'''''

]
This was originally written by an anon and despite being slightly edited, and kinda unencyclopaedic, it is very factual in the biographical side and I reckon it's a really good read nontheless.




''''' Recommeded discussions page:''''' ''''' Recommeded discussions page:'''''


The discussions page sometimes contains more than the actual article, and provides an isight into the subject and the contributor and which opinion should be taken more seriously.
]
This is a really contentious issue with many archived discussions, it is still ongoing and there is simply too much to take in. I don't know but maybe the discussions page merits several articles of its own.
My Two penneth: I believe there is a case for revision of certain facts. But denying any or all facts relating to the event is misguided. Similarly, do-gooders should not mistakenly label revisionism as denial!


== My Contributions, Etc>>> == == My Contributions, Etc>>> ==

Revision as of 16:19, 1 May 2006

Today is 25 December 2024
This user maintains a strict policy advising against all personal attacks.

Template:User freedom

I TEND TO RAMBLE!


EDIT DON'T REVERT I will never revert a page that has been edited in good faith. If someone has something to say, even if 99% of the populace disagree it probably is still relevant. This is where there is no consensus between wikepedians:

NPOV vs. POV : Actually Wikepedia's policy on Neutrality is rather contradictory to itself and can be read in two ways. 1) Avoid any opinions and include only published fact 2} Include all fact, and represent all opinions. Since there is no way to decide which facts are correct and which are mere opinions, the second one seems logical, and unlike other encyclopaedias this one has the added bonus of a discussions page where you can often see nationalistic, local or egoistic pride shine! And form an objective view of your own.

Editing, NOT reverting, is usually the bst way when a big addition has taken place. I bet you can find something worthy in every edit...look hard! Otherwise those trying to Be Bold...will eventually give in! What is the point in constant reverts, a revert war...only one opinion being promulgated! That is not objectivity, nor beneficial.


NATIONALISTIC PRIDE IN ARTICLES IS DAFT No matter what the old wives tales say..you cannot change historical fact, even with revisionism, the French forces didn't win at Agincourt, Germany did win world war II, The British Empire didn't ultimitely become a galactic force and Andorra doesn't rule the world!! You cannot dismiss someone becuase of their birthplace.

This user lives in the United Kingdom.
UKThis user uses British English.
This user lives in England.
This user is proud to be English.
derbyshireThis user is from Derbyshire, "The Peak District"

My name's Christopher. I have a degree in history, specialising in European political and Royal from about 400 to 1500 and classical theological history. I have a real interest in pure politics and theology too. These are all pretty intermingled though.

My religious beliefs don't easily fit anywhere. I believe all the Gods are as important as eachother, but i am not polytheistic. I worship whichever god, from whichever pantheon, seems appropriate at the time. I also believe in the monotheistic religions, Viewing Yahweh, God and Allah as distinct entitities, but ultimitely superior to the other Gods, which they created. (everyone needs a helping hand, right?) For me The Jewish messiahs, Jesus and Muhammad are equally as important, but only as teachers. I would consider myslef closer to a mix of Arianism than other christianities.


This week's Recommended page:


Recommeded discussions page:

The discussions page sometimes contains more than the actual article, and provides an isight into the subject and the contributor and which opinion should be taken more seriously.

My Contributions, Etc>>>

]

Template:Babel-8

Userboxes
AmE-0 This user does not understand the American English language and bloody well doesn't want to.
blzThis user understands blazon.
Template:User du-1
LE-1This user's been known to screw up the occasional sentence and make the occasional typo, but is otherwise pretty accurate with regards to English.
Template:User ubx-5
prog-0This user does not know how to program.
…in.Ending a sentence with a preposition is something that this user is okay with.
…This user is addicted to ellipses and has been known to use them indiscriminately...
18+This user is an adult.
Template:User childlessTemplate:User never left Northern HemisphereTemplate:User GMT
BAThis user has a Bachelor of Arts degree.
Template:User mental health perd Template:User Epileptic Template:User smoker Template:User zodiac:Taurus Template:User Chinese zodiac:Dog
This user is opposed to online censorship.
Template:User not censored Template:User Conservation Movement Template:User green energy Template:User Public Transit Template:User Recycling Template:User pacifist4Template:User politicsTemplate:User moderateTemplate:User liberty
This user is a monarchist.
PC-0 I am politically incorrect. Hence, I will use common sense and speak plainly rather than trip all over myself trying to be inoffensive.
Template:User theist2Template:User staticinfinite Template:User theistic evolution2Template:User Sex EducationTemplate:User queerTemplate:User RomeTemplate:User yellowTemplate:User LimeWire Template:User winxp Template:User cvg Template:User PC
This user is a Wikipedian.
This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know.
Template:User copyright
This user finds edit/revert wars disruptive.
This user reserves the right to completely screw up his own edits.
Public domainContent contributed by this user is released into the public domain.
Categories: