Misplaced Pages

User talk:76.31.236.91: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:40, 12 September 2011 edit76.31.236.91 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 23:42, 12 September 2011 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,759 edits Undid revision 450172401 by 76.31.236.91 (talk) highly inappropriate unblock request - revoking talk page privilegesNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
Please read the ] for more information. ''']''' ''']''' ] 20:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)}} Please read the ] for more information. ''']''' ''']''' ] 20:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)}}
:It is clear behaviorally that you are not a new user here, and it is even clearer that you are a sockpuppet. ''']''' ''']''' ] 20:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC) :It is clear behaviorally that you are not a new user here, and it is even clearer that you are a sockpuppet. ''']''' ''']''' ] 20:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock| As per your previous: I am not a sockpuppet, as I am not "FaheyUSMC". I am not sure what you mean by "disruption" but if you read the source provided for the quote on that webpage, it is quite clear that the impetus of the Kickstarter project is Ryan Sohmer's own public statement that he believes his intellectual property to have been violated. To quote the source itself: "Cut to recently. It was brought to my attention that the kind folks at Teletoon took a lot of our hard work, both intellectual and art, and used it in one of their new series. Not only that, but they took our hard work and made a shitty series.". To write it up while leaving that particular portion of the event out is dishonest and violates Misplaced Pages's policies of Verifiability and Neutral Point of View. The block is not necessary because no damage has been done to wikipedia, nor have I engaged in any disruption. The block is still unnecessary because after it is lifted I will not cause any damage or disruption to wikipedia. As for useful contributions, when I see something that needs fixing, as per WP:BOLD, I will fix it. But I shall not at any time kiss the ass of overly silly individuals who wish to engage in a gestapo manner. Clear?}}

Revision as of 23:42, 12 September 2011

September 2011

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Least I Could Do. This contravenes Misplaced Pages's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Elizium23 (talk) 15:41, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.31.236.91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am unsure what you mean by "sockpuppet" but I am not anyone by the name FaheyUSMC. Further, could someone please point me to the supposed discussion regarding the update I added to the Least I Could Do page? I saw a note saying it had been 'already discussed' but I can find zero mention of this or any discussion on the talkpage. I most strenuously object to being blocked for a month on the say-so of people who will not bother to even discuss a topic.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is clear behaviorally that you are not a new user here, and it is even clearer that you are a sockpuppet. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)