| Revision as of 00:35, 20 September 2011 editZero0000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators41,825 edits →Administrative sanctions on I-P articles: AE case against you← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:59, 20 September 2011 edit undoTimotheus Canens (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators38,430 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| You are being reported for violation of arbitration restrictions on I-P articles. Your case file will appear at ] in a few minutes. You can reply to the charges there. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 00:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | You are being reported for violation of arbitration restrictions on I-P articles. Your case file will appear at ] in a few minutes. You can reply to the charges there. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 00:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == September 2011 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] To enforce an ] decision, you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. ] (]) 00:59, 20 September 2011 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Notice to administrators:''' In a <span class="plainlinks"></span>, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as ] or ]). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the ]. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
Revision as of 00:59, 20 September 2011
Administrative sanctions on I-P articles
Please read the banner "ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES" at the head of Talk:Demographics of Palestine. You just broke the 1RR restriction, for which can be blocked. Next time you will be reported, this is your only warning. You will probably be reported for disruptive editing soon anyway. Zero 01:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
I was 18 minutes short. Whoops.
You are being disruptive if you think you can threaten people who don't have the same worldview as you.Modinyr (talk) 21:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
You are being reported for violation of arbitration restrictions on I-P articles. Your case file will appear at WP:AE in a few minutes. You can reply to the charges there. Zero 00:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
September 2011
Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."