Revision as of 04:24, 22 September 2011 editKwamikagami (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Template editors475,380 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:40, 31 May 2013 edit undoBattyBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,933,728 editsm Talk page general fixes & other cleanup using AWBNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Languages|class=start|importance=Low|needs-infobox=no}} | {{WikiProject Languages|class=start|importance=Low|needs-infobox=no}} | ||
{{WikiProject Netherlands|class=Start|importance=Mid}} | {{WikiProject Netherlands|class=Start|importance=Mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Belgium|class=Start|importance=Low}} | {{WikiProject Belgium|class=Start|importance=Low}} | ||
}} | |||
==Attribution== | ==Attribution== |
Revision as of 03:40, 31 May 2013
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Attribution
Page was created as summary-style article split from Dutch language. Diff: CIreland (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Unmotivated tag
As far as I can see, there is no contradiction whatsoever between the content of this article and that of nl:Nederlandse dialecten, let alone a serious one. Who is responsible for this tag and on what grounds could it have been assigned? I am very curious to hear which reservations on whose side there possibly could be here. It looks like some unexplicable mystery. -- Ad43 (talk) 14:58, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Focus
This article is a part of a series on |
Dutch |
---|
Low Saxon dialects |
West Low Franconian dialects |
East Low Franconian dialects |
The whole article lacks focus. Its subject is not clearly defined. It should about either:
- Dialects of the Dutch language; or
- Dialects of the Netherlands
The definition:
- Dutch dialects are primarily the dialects that are both cognate with the Dutch language
- and are spoken in the same language area as the Dutch standard language.
does not make much sense. By this definition French Flemish would not be a Dutch dialect, while Lower Saxon would arguably be. Then the article goes on to mention several dialects outside the area of the Dutch standard language.
So what should it be? All dialects spoken in the Netherlands (including Frisian), or, as I would suggest, all dialect varieties of modern Lower Frankish (of which Dutch is the only official standard language). This would exclude Frisian and Lower Saxon.--Joostik (talk) 19:00, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- I think the template {{Dutch dialects}} (displayed on the right) covers most dialects. Frisian is not a dialect - it's a language. If Frisian would be mentioned in the article, than for that reason and that reason only. Low Saxon should be included, though. Richard 07:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)