| Revision as of 17:04, 9 October 2011 editCameron Scott (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers18,639 edits →October 2011← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:09, 9 October 2011 edit undoBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,137 edits You have been blocked from editing for violation of the three-revert rule. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| Your account has been reported for edit-warring and is likely to be blocked shortly. You can maybe prevent this by ceasing and persisting in your current action. However as you have already been blocked once for your edits to ] I think that is unlikely. --] (]) 17:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC) | Your account has been reported for edit-warring and is likely to be blocked shortly. You can maybe prevent this by ceasing and persisting in your current action. However as you have already been blocked once for your edits to ] I think that is unlikely. --] (]) 17:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for your ] caused by ] by violation of the ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] ] 17:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block --> | |||
Revision as of 17:09, 9 October 2011
September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Yuri Dojc, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Misplaced Pages articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yuri Dojc was changed by Maple08syrup (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855388 on 2011-09-03T09:57:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Misplaced Pages page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Misplaced Pages policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Cameron Scott (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- We do not consider primary court documents as suitable for BLP articles - we need reports in reliable sources such as newspapers etc. --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
You actually need a reliable source that says there is a problem with the photo - "ask any rabbi" is not a reliable sources. Misplaced Pages articles need verification, you cannot use the article to present your own findings. --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:15, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did at Yuri Dojc, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Bbb23 (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones 20:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Yuri Dojc. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Your account has been reported for edit-warring and is likely to be blocked shortly. You can maybe prevent this by ceasing and persisting in your current action. However as you have already been blocked once for your edits to Yuri Dojc I think that is unlikely. --Cameron Scott (talk) 17:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 17:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)