Talk:CFB North Bay: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:20, 12 October 2011 editBenlisquare (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,176 editsm Reverted edits by 22WHERO (talk) to last version by RJHall← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:16, 8 December 2011 edit undo22WHERO (talk \| contribs)441 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 26:		Line 26:

	You '''cannot''' use ''yourself'' as a reference. References must be ] and ], and should be properly cited. Anything else is considered ], and under Misplaced Pages policy, must be deleted immediately. Your recent additions are still unreferenced, as you have merely cited yourself as a reference - print references such as books, journals and newspaper articles require the format '''AUTHOR – DATE – TITLE – PUBLISHER – PAGE – ISBN NUMBER''', while online sources require a URL, Title, Author and Date (while noting that the source must still be ]), all placed at the bottom of the article in a reference list, using the <nowiki>{{Reflist}}</nowiki> template. ] are preferred, so that each sentence can be verified by a footnote linking to a reference (through the use of the <nowiki><ref></nowiki> tag). A source is only ] if it is written in the proper format, so that others are ''able'' to verify it. Also consider learning to use WikiSyntax when writing articles, and ensuring that you are able to properly use templates. Additionally, it can be argued that you have a ] with the given article; Misplaced Pages prohibits users from editing articles that may have a direct relation with the individual person; given by your username, ''"22wingheritageoffice"'', which appears to show that this account is being used by an office of an establishment, such editing may be in violation with ]. Also note that you cannot ] articles; if your edits have been reverted, there is most possibly a reason for it. --<span style="border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;">]</span> \| <small>—] ] ]</small> 04:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)		You '''cannot''' use ''yourself'' as a reference. References must be ] and ], and should be properly cited. Anything else is considered ], and under Misplaced Pages policy, must be deleted immediately. Your recent additions are still unreferenced, as you have merely cited yourself as a reference - print references such as books, journals and newspaper articles require the format '''AUTHOR – DATE – TITLE – PUBLISHER – PAGE – ISBN NUMBER''', while online sources require a URL, Title, Author and Date (while noting that the source must still be ]), all placed at the bottom of the article in a reference list, using the <nowiki>{{Reflist}}</nowiki> template. ] are preferred, so that each sentence can be verified by a footnote linking to a reference (through the use of the <nowiki><ref></nowiki> tag). A source is only ] if it is written in the proper format, so that others are ''able'' to verify it. Also consider learning to use WikiSyntax when writing articles, and ensuring that you are able to properly use templates. Additionally, it can be argued that you have a ] with the given article; Misplaced Pages prohibits users from editing articles that may have a direct relation with the individual person; given by your username, ''"22wingheritageoffice"'', which appears to show that this account is being used by an office of an establishment, such editing may be in violation with ]. Also note that you cannot ] articles; if your edits have been reverted, there is most possibly a reason for it. --<span style="border:1px solid yellow;padding:1px;">]</span> \| <small>—] ] ]</small> 04:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

			==Note About The Above==

			The response was sent by Benlisquare after he was reamed by the 22 Wing Heritage Officer for allowing an unsubstantiated, uncited page to be created about CFB North Bay that was rife with mistakes, written by people who (a) were not from the base and (b) had made no effort to contact the base for information. The irony of his rant is that he upbraids the 22 Wing Heritage Officer for improper references, no citations, etc., when he, himself, let the page go without any references, citations, etc., and without checking the accuracy of the document. Twit. ] (]) 15:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:16, 8 December 2011

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Aviation / Canadian / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Spaceflight

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Canada: Ontario Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North Bay/Jack Garland Airport/CFB North Bay

Are these two close enough to be merged? I don't know enough about them to say. CambridgeBayWeather 16:05, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

No, the two are unrelated, although this was not always the case. Originally, the airfield was part of the base, however, after the cuts to CFB North Bay, the airfield ownership reverted to the City of North Bay. The two are geographically close, however, there are no CFB North Bay opperations taking place at the airfield which now operates solely as a civilian airfield. Hope that clears things up a bit. -Hauger 00:07 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Whoever wrote the information regarding Tudhope and the airfields, can you provide links or further information, especially regarding Diver? I used to go to the McConnell Lake area as a kid and knew Diver was an old air field, but there's absolutely no information regarding it.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.254.189.157 (talk) 03:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:OR by User talk:22wingheritageoffice

You cannot use yourself as a reference. References must be reliable and verifiable, and should be properly cited. Anything else is considered WP:Original research, and under Misplaced Pages policy, must be deleted immediately. Your recent additions are still unreferenced, as you have merely cited yourself as a reference - print references such as books, journals and newspaper articles require the format AUTHOR – DATE – TITLE – PUBLISHER – PAGE – ISBN NUMBER, while online sources require a URL, Title, Author and Date (while noting that the source must still be WP:RS), all placed at the bottom of the article in a reference list, using the {{Reflist}} template. WP:Inline citations are preferred, so that each sentence can be verified by a footnote linking to a reference (through the use of the <ref> tag). A source is only WP:V if it is written in the proper format, so that others are able to verify it. Also consider learning to use WikiSyntax when writing articles, and ensuring that you are able to properly use templates. Additionally, it can be argued that you have a conflict of interest with the given article; Misplaced Pages prohibits users from editing articles that may have a direct relation with the individual person; given by your username, "22wingheritageoffice", which appears to show that this account is being used by an office of an establishment, such editing may be in violation with WP:COI. Also note that you cannot WP:OWN articles; if your edits have been reverted, there is most possibly a reason for it. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 04:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Note About The Above

The response was sent by Benlisquare after he was reamed by the 22 Wing Heritage Officer for allowing an unsubstantiated, uncited page to be created about CFB North Bay that was rife with mistakes, written by people who (a) were not from the base and (b) had made no effort to contact the base for information. The irony of his rant is that he upbraids the 22 Wing Heritage Officer for improper references, no citations, etc., when he, himself, let the page go without any references, citations, etc., and without checking the accuracy of the document. Twit. 22WHERO (talk) 15:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Categories: