Revision as of 14:30, 16 October 2011 editHellknowz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors32,842 edits →GA Review: cmt← Previous edit |
Revision as of 15:25, 16 October 2011 edit undo7arazred (talk | contribs)496 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → |
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
{{Good article tools}} |
|
{{Good article tools}} |
|
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Revolution Software/GA2|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is ] from ]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
|
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Revolution Software/GA2|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is ] from ]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> |
|
|
|
|
'''Reviewer:''' ] (] '''·''' ]) 21:39, 6 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
|
|
|
|
|
===Checking against GA criteria=== |
|
|
|
|
|
:'''] review''' (see ] for what the criteria are, and ] for what they are not) |
|
|
|
|
|
#It is '''well written'''. |
|
|
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''(] for ], ], ], ], and ])'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: The lead adequately summarises the article, see ] |
|
|
#::The prose good, it is "reasonably well written". |
|
|
#::It's well organised, information is presented logically. Please read ] and subpages. |
|
|
#It is '''accurate''' and ''']'''. |
|
|
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''(citations to ])'': {{GAList/check|y}} c ''(])'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|n}} |
|
|
#It is '''stable'''. |
|
|
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#:: stable |
|
|
{{GAList/check|}} b ''(appropriate use with ])'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#'''Overall''': |
|
|
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
|
|
#::Shoddily put together, please read the ] and make sure that this article meetrs them before renominating. ] (]) 22:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
#:: <!-- Template:GAList --> |
|
|
|
|
|
This artcile has not been reviewed. ] simply copied and pasted ] altering the failure points to passes. ] (]) 14:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Seconding the above just for the record. Apparently by ], though I cannot see how this is any short of socking given ] created this page 10 min later. — <small> ] ▎]</small> 14:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC) |
|