Misplaced Pages

Talk:Revolution Software/GA2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Revolution Software Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:30, 16 October 2011 editHellknowz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors32,842 edits GA Review: cmt← Previous edit Revision as of 15:25, 16 October 2011 edit undo7arazred (talk | contribs)496 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Good article tools}} {{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Revolution Software/GA2|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is ] from ]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly> <noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Revolution Software/GA2|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is ] from ]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>

'''Reviewer:''' ]&nbsp;(] '''·''' ]) 21:39, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->

===Checking against GA criteria===

:'''] review''' (see ] for what the criteria are, and ] for what they are not)

#It is '''well written'''.
#:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''(] for ], ], ], ], and ])'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#:: The lead adequately summarises the article, see ]
#::The prose good, it is "reasonably well written".
#::It's well organised, information is presented logically. Please read ] and subpages.
#It is '''accurate''' and ''']'''.
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''(citations to ])'': {{GAList/check|y}} c ''(])'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|n}}
#It is '''stable'''.
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#:: stable
{{GAList/check|}} b ''(appropriate use with ])'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#'''Overall''':
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|y}}
#::Shoddily put together, please read the ] and make sure that this article meetrs them before renominating. ] (]) 22:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
#:: <!-- Template:GAList -->

This artcile has not been reviewed. ] simply copied and pasted ] altering the failure points to passes. ] (]) 14:24, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

:Seconding the above just for the record. Apparently by ], though I cannot see how this is any short of socking given ] created this page 10 min later. —&nbsp;<small>&nbsp;]&nbsp;&nbsp;▎]</small> 14:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:25, 16 October 2011

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history· Article talk (edit | history· Watch