Revision as of 09:51, 27 March 2006 view sourceCecropia (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Administrators12,718 editsm When did Mr. Bell gain the competence to specify how promotions are performed?← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:12, 27 March 2006 view source Locke Cole (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,894 edits partial rvt of Cecropia: next time, keep civility in mind, eh? ; punctuation and formattingNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Currently active bureaucrats== | ==Currently active bureaucrats== | ||
(as of '''17 March 2006''') | (as of '''17 March 2006''') | ||
=== |
===Bureaucrats active at ]=== | ||
Bureaucrats who have made at least '''one''' of the last . | Bureaucrats who have made at least '''one''' of the last . | ||
#] | #] | ||
Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
#] | #] | ||
=== |
===Bureaucrats actively performing user renames=== | ||
Bureaucrats who have performed at least '''one''' of the last . | Bureaucrats who have performed at least '''one''' of the last . | ||
Line 33: | Line 36: | ||
==Other bureaucrats== | ==Other bureaucrats== | ||
===Less active bureaucrats=== | ===Less active bureaucrats=== | ||
The following bureaucrats have made at least '''one''' promotion or '''one''' user rename since January 2005 ('''''n'' > 0'''). | The following bureaucrats have made at least '''one''' promotion or '''one''' user rename since January 2005 ('''''n'' > 0'''). | ||
#] -- same person as ] | #] -- same person as ] | ||
Line 38: | Line 42: | ||
===Inactive bureaucrats=== | ===Inactive bureaucrats=== | ||
The following bureaucrats have not performed bureaucrat duties since the beginning of 2005. | The following bureaucrats have not performed bureaucrat duties since the beginning of 2005. | ||
#] | #] | ||
Line 48: | Line 53: | ||
#] | #] | ||
=== |
===Former bureaucrats=== | ||
#] ]. | #] ]. | ||
#] - inactive at Misplaced Pages since 7 Mar 2004, bureaucrat flag removed Feb 2006 | #] - inactive at Misplaced Pages since 7 Mar 2004, bureaucrat flag removed Feb 2006 | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*] | *] | ||
*], ]s | *], ]s | ||
Line 58: | Line 65: | ||
==Instructions for sysoping someone== | ==Instructions for sysoping someone== | ||
#Wait at least seven days after the listing was made on ] | #Wait at least seven days after the listing was made on ]. | ||
#If it is not a self-request, check the user has accepted the nomination | #If it is not a self-request, check the user has accepted the nomination. | ||
#Check if there is a general consensus that the person should be sysopped (the rule of thumb is that nominees with less than a 75% support:oppose ratio are not promoted without extenuating circumstances, such as elimination of sockpuppets or bogus votes. Similarly those with more than 80% support generally are, and you should use discretion in between) | #Check if there is a general consensus that the person should be sysopped (the rule of thumb is that nominees with less than a 75% support:oppose ratio are not promoted without extenuating circumstances, such as elimination of sockpuppets or bogus votes. Similarly those with more than 80% support generally are, and you should use discretion in between). | ||
#*Use this formula to calculate the ratio: <math>{support} \div ({support} + {oppose})</math> | |||
#In the case of ''bureaucrat nominations'' be aware that, in a year and a half, no-one has become a bureaucrat without at least '''90%''' support and only two have been made bureaucrat with more than two opposes. | #In the case of ''bureaucrat nominations'' be aware that, in a year and a half, no-one has become a bureaucrat without at least '''90%''' support and only two have been made bureaucrat with more than two opposes. | ||
#If you make a ''sysop promotion'' or deny one outside of the above guidelines, or in the area between '''75%''' and '''80%''', be prepared to make an explanation to any editors who ask in a civil manner. | #If you make a ''sysop promotion'' or deny one outside of the above guidelines, or in the area between '''75%''' and '''80%''', be prepared to make an explanation to any editors who ask in a civil manner. | ||
#If the above conditions are met, make them an admin or bureaucrat using ] and add their name to the list at ] or ] | #If the above conditions are met, make them an admin or bureaucrat using ] and add their name to the list at ] or ]. | ||
#Use <tt><b><nowiki>{{subst:rfap}}-{{subst:rfab}}</nowiki></b></tt> as a header and footer, respectively, when closing a successful nomination. Similarly, use <tt><b><nowiki>{{subst:rfaf}}-{{subst:rfab}}</nowiki></b></tt> for a failed nomination. Remove the "Vote here" link. Place the word Final before the parenthetic voting results, change "ending" to "ended" and update the ending time and date to reflect the current time and date. | #Use <tt><b><nowiki>{{subst:rfap}}-{{subst:rfab}}</nowiki></b></tt> as a header and footer, respectively, when closing a successful nomination. Similarly, use <tt><b><nowiki>{{subst:rfaf}}-{{subst:rfab}}</nowiki></b></tt> for a failed nomination. Remove the "Vote here" link. Place the word Final before the parenthetic voting results, change "ending" to "ended" and update the ending time and date to reflect the current time and date. | ||
#For successful nominations, move the listing from ] to ] or ]. For unsuccessful administrator nominations, move the listing to ]. For unsuccessful bureaucrat nominations, just remove the transclusion from requests for adminship. | #For successful nominations, move the listing from ] to ] or ]. For unsuccessful administrator nominations, move the listing to ]. For unsuccessful bureaucrat nominations, just remove the transclusion from requests for adminship. | ||
Line 70: | Line 78: | ||
==Instructions for changing usernames== | ==Instructions for changing usernames== | ||
#Check that the request at ] is legitimate |
#Check that the request at ] is legitimate. | ||
#Be sure that the user has no history of abuse and that the request is in the best interest of the project. Use your judgement. | #Be sure that the user has no history of abuse and that the request is in the best interest of the project. Use your judgement. | ||
#Enter the old and new name at ] | #Enter the old and new name at ]. | ||
#Recreate the old account and then block it. This prevents someone else creating it in an attempt to impersonate the renamed user. | #Recreate the old account and then block it. This prevents someone else creating it in an attempt to impersonate the renamed user. | ||
#Redirect the user and talk pages of the old account to the new account | #Redirect the user and talk pages of the old account to the new account. | ||
#Inform the user their request has been carried out | #Inform the user their request has been carried out. | ||
#Archive the request at ] | #Archive the request at ]. | ||
== |
==See also== | ||
* |
*] | ||
] | ] |
Revision as of 12:12, 27 March 2006
Shortcut- ]
The following is a list of Wikipedians entrusted to perform bureaucratic functions on the English Misplaced Pages, which consists of giving administrator or bureaucrat access to other users following consensus on Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship, and changing user names.
- Use this link to generate a list of all users who have bureaucrat permissions.
- To apply to become a bureaucrat, please go to Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship#Requests_for_bureaucratship.
Currently active bureaucrats
(as of 17 March 2006)
Bureaucrats active at WP:RfA
Bureaucrats who have made at least one of the last 100 promotions.
Bureaucrats actively performing user renames
Bureaucrats who have performed at least one of the last 100 user renames.
Other bureaucrats
Less active bureaucrats
The following bureaucrats have made at least one promotion or one user rename since January 2005 (n > 0).
- Cimon avaro (n = 2)-- same person as User:J-V Heiskanen
- Pakaran (n = 18)
Inactive bureaucrats
The following bureaucrats have not performed bureaucrat duties since the beginning of 2005.
- Bcorr (n = 0)
- Cprompt (n = 0)
- Danny (n = 0)
- Infrogmation (n = 0)
- Kingturtle (n = 0) (i'd be active, but i'm always beaten to the punch)
- Jwrosenzweig (n = 0)
- Stan Shebs (n = 0)
- TUF-KAT (n = 0)
Former bureaucrats
- Ed Poor resigned 12 September 2005.
- Optim - inactive at Misplaced Pages since 7 Mar 2004, bureaucrat flag removed Feb 2006
See also
Instructions for sysoping someone
- Wait at least seven days after the listing was made on Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship.
- If it is not a self-request, check the user has accepted the nomination.
- Check if there is a general consensus that the person should be sysopped (the rule of thumb is that nominees with less than a 75% support:oppose ratio are not promoted without extenuating circumstances, such as elimination of sockpuppets or bogus votes. Similarly those with more than 80% support generally are, and you should use discretion in between).
- Use this formula to calculate the ratio:
- In the case of bureaucrat nominations be aware that, in a year and a half, no-one has become a bureaucrat without at least 90% support and only two have been made bureaucrat with more than two opposes.
- If you make a sysop promotion or deny one outside of the above guidelines, or in the area between 75% and 80%, be prepared to make an explanation to any editors who ask in a civil manner.
- If the above conditions are met, make them an admin or bureaucrat using Special:Makesysop and add their name to the list at Misplaced Pages:List of administrators or Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats.
- Use {{subst:rfap}}-{{subst:rfab}} as a header and footer, respectively, when closing a successful nomination. Similarly, use {{subst:rfaf}}-{{subst:rfab}} for a failed nomination. Remove the "Vote here" link. Place the word Final before the parenthetic voting results, change "ending" to "ended" and update the ending time and date to reflect the current time and date.
- For successful nominations, move the listing from requests for adminship to recently created admins or recently created bureaucrats. For unsuccessful administrator nominations, move the listing to Misplaced Pages:Unsuccessful adminship candidacies. For unsuccessful bureaucrat nominations, just remove the transclusion from requests for adminship.
- If the nomination has succeeded, inform the user that they are now a sysop or bureaucrat. If the nomination has failed, inform the user of this in a supportive manner.
Instructions for changing usernames
- Check that the request at Misplaced Pages:Changing username is legitimate.
- Be sure that the user has no history of abuse and that the request is in the best interest of the project. Use your judgement.
- Enter the old and new name at Special:Renameuser.
- Recreate the old account and then block it. This prevents someone else creating it in an attempt to impersonate the renamed user.
- Redirect the user and talk pages of the old account to the new account.
- Inform the user their request has been carried out.
- Archive the request at Misplaced Pages:Changing username.