| Revision as of 16:58, 28 October 2011 editMarek69 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers195,899 edits →Vidyalaya Higher Secondary School: userfication request← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:20, 29 October 2011 edit undoRaymond88824 (talk | contribs)323 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
| Kind Regards -- ]<small>.</small>]] 16:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC) | Kind Regards -- ]<small>.</small>]] 16:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ==Corey Delaney== | |||
| I think a error of judgement has been made in many cases involving this page, in fact the majority of people actually support the page in some of the many cases its been mention, its actually had a Admin recreate it while its been protected, I seen that the page has been protested 5 times in deletion review and 6 times under his other name Corey Worthington. My question is why have you chosen to delete this page while is has over 100 new related references? Here a short guide of the evnts ] | |||
| A timely apply will be welcomed. Ray-Rays 09:20, 29 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:20, 29 October 2011
|
Larger GT/FTs subsuming smaller onesI thought that when a large-scale FT/GT was submitted that it subsumed smaller ones, like my Battlecruisers of the Royal Navy GT absorbed the individual class GTs. But the Armored cruisers of Germany GT didn't absorb the individual class GTs. I bring this up because the Battlecruisers of Japan GT that I just nominated should absorb the existing Kongo-class battlecruiser GT. And we wouldn't want to be inconsistent...--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC) Scjessey is disruptiveI see that User:II mentions on ANI that Scjessey has been judged by the suitable committee, yourself included. I also see that Scjessey is still acting disruptively against other users. User II notes this, not me. Therefore, I propose that Scjessey just be banned from the articles. As for me, I am just making a few suggestions on the Obama and Perry articles, asking people to re-examine what is important. Trivial details, such as a trivial law passed, is not a significant part of a biography and shouldn't be there. I ahve no political agenda, either for or against the men. BAMP (talk) 18:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Brimstone (wrestler)When will this page be unprotected? It has been protected for SIX MONTHS.Theclarkie (talk) 21:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC) The Signpost: 24 October 2011
New Page Patrol survey
Vidyalaya Higher Secondary SchoolHi Wizardman, You recently deleted Sri Jarendra Saraswathi Vidyalaya Higher Secondary School Would you mind transferring the last version to User:Sarathchandar/Sri Jarendra Saraswathi Vidyalaya Higher Secondary School, so that the author can work on it there. Kind Regards -- Marek.69 16:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC) Corey DelaneyI think a error of judgement has been made in many cases involving this page, in fact the majority of people actually support the page in some of the many cases its been mention, its actually had a Admin recreate it while its been protected, I seen that the page has been protested 5 times in deletion review and 6 times under his other name Corey Worthington. My question is why have you chosen to delete this page while is has over 100 new related references? Here a short guide of the evnts http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Corey_Delaney_discussion A timely apply will be welcomed. Ray-Rays 09:20, 29 October 2011 (UTC) |
