Misplaced Pages

User talk:Brewcrewer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:04, 1 November 2011 editNableezy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,155 edits →AE: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 02:07, 2 November 2011 edit undoDronkle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,793 edits →Tendentiousness around "Judea and Samaria": new sectionNext edit →
Line 57: Line 57:


Because your hounding has reached a new level of disruption, I have taken the issue to AE. You can see this ]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 15:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)</small> Because your hounding has reached a new level of disruption, I have taken the issue to AE. You can see this ]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 15:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)</small>

== Tendentiousness around "Judea and Samaria" ==

You are quite blatantly being tendentious. if you don't shut up, then I'm taking you to ].--] (]) 02:07, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:07, 2 November 2011

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Brewcrewer.

Archives

Merging

Please express your opinion over the suggestion to merge the article Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into Timeline of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both articles are substantially the same, and shouldn't exist in separate. You can participate in the discussion here Talk:Violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict#Merging with Timeline of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.Greyshark09 (talk) 19:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Removal of edits to Mahmoud Asgari and Ayaz Marhoni article

I have already contacted ExRat with an appeal for help concerning the removal of additions which I recently made to the above article. As a somewhat new Misplaced Pages user, I am hoping that this is the right way to contact you to talk about this. I saw both ExRat and Brewcrewer in the "View history" for that article, and I wanted to also contact you for any assistance with properly adding what really does seem to me to be very important information to the above article, which may give an explanation as to what actually occurred and led up to the executions. This information is not new, it is from 2007, but it is the first information I have seen anywhere which seems to really explain what actually occurred. The information was from an Iranian LGBT magazine and was quoted on a Russian web site (possibly a blog) commemorating the two year anniversary of the executions. Thank you for any advice and help you can give in this situation. Jcvaughan2004 (talk) 19:31, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Reconsider Pallywood

I referred to a footnote, which you say you can't see. It's right there, note 3. from the Jerusalem Post (But pro-Israel media-watchdog advocates have gone further, arguing that the footage is a prime example of what has been dubbed "Pallywood" - media manipulation, distortion and outright fraud by the Palestinians (and other Arabs, such as the Reuters photographer caught faking photos during the Second Lebanon War), designed to win the public relations war against Israel.) So, do the decent thing old chap, and reconsider. The edit you reverted had a solid reason you just happened to miss. We all have our bad days.Nishidani (talk) 21:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

which JP article?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Noloop

Thought you might want to know that User:Noloop/User:Mindbunny has said you are racist in this comment. I've asked him to redact the comment on his Talk: page. Jayjg 00:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

in an ironically racist comment.......one of those ANI's might be in order.......but didn't he go though a whole bunch of them on his other user name..User:Mindbunny?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Care to explain?

I reverted your edit. Under WP:TAGGING: "Anyone who sees a tag, but does not see the purported problem with the article and does not see any detailed complaint on the talk page, may remove the tag." In the future, please do not add POV tags without following the proper procedure. Thanks. -asad (talk) 20:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Brewcrewer! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

AE

Because your hounding has reached a new level of disruption, I have taken the issue to AE. You can see this here. nableezy - 15:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Tendentiousness around "Judea and Samaria"

You are quite blatantly being tendentious. if you don't shut up, then I'm taking you to WP;AE.--Peter cohen (talk) 02:07, 2 November 2011 (UTC)