| Revision as of 12:29, 30 March 2006 editRlevse (talk | contribs)93,195 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:01, 13 April 2006 edit undoPhoenix79 (talk | contribs)6,884 edits Merge Vote on Ultraviolet mapNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| :PS, I also found a 5000 edits user box, I'm up to over 6800.] 12:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC) | :PS, I also found a 5000 edits user box, I'm up to over 6800.] 12:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Merge Vote on ] == | |||
| Hi I was thinking about taking this whole merge discussion in an entirely different direction. Instead of merging the info on the poorly named ] into the unfocused ]. How about we expand on ]'s idea and create sub sections on known Hatches? | |||
| Remember the "The DHARMA Initiative" article is supposed to '''focus''' on what it is. Adding more information to "''the Swan''" only shows that this hatch should be expanded upon in another article. The title of this article after all is ''not'' "The DHARMA Hatches." To me it looks like we should put in some information about what exactly the DHARMA Initiative is. We should give some history on it maybe include the information on the film and then some brief information about the hatches and what they are. Hatches that we know more about like "The Swan" should have its own page that would then contain information such as "the Map", "The Timer", etc... I think that this is a more reasonable solution and would also make it a more logical solution as an encyclopedia article. Please let me know what you think (in your talk page)! And if you do agree please note that on your merge vote! Thanks -- ] 04:01, 13 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:01, 13 April 2006
Hey
Thanks for voting on the Merit badge types (BSA) FAC. Now you're not a "cherry boy". Rlevse 19:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Editing
One generally puts short notes about why they edited something in the "Edit Summary" below the edit window. These comments will show in the history list. Talk pages for an article are for longer, more verbal discussions. PS: new talk entries go at the bottom, not the top, of a page and should have a header.Rlevse 15:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Hey YOU
Where's my popcorn! I saw your vote in the Wisconsin. Rlevse 23:21, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
User SaintCliff
(pasted from my talk page to Coffeeboy's) Hah! I just noticed that you have User SaintCliff on your userpage. Are you a Cheers fan too? Staxringold 16:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, my best buddy and I at work User:Coffeeboy, is a Cheers fan too. He and I made the userbox (his idea, my code). I voted for your Cheers fac too. Nice to work with you. Rlevse 16:55, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Cool. I made a semi-serious proposal at Misplaced Pages talk:Mascot, if you're interested. Maybe the three of us should propose it on a more widely read page like the Village Pump? Staxringold 17:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Rlevse 17:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- I put him up on meta:Wikipedia_mascot! Staxringold 19:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Lost (TV series)
This is up for FAC, you haven't commented....?? Rlevse 12:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- PS, I also found a 5000 edits user box, I'm up to over 6800.Rlevse 12:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Merge Vote on Ultraviolet map
Hi I was thinking about taking this whole merge discussion in an entirely different direction. Instead of merging the info on the poorly named Ultraviolet map into the unfocused The DHARMA Initiative. How about we expand on Silentplanet's idea and create sub sections on known Hatches?
Remember the "The DHARMA Initiative" article is supposed to focus on what it is. Adding more information to "the Swan" only shows that this hatch should be expanded upon in another article. The title of this article after all is not "The DHARMA Hatches." To me it looks like we should put in some information about what exactly the DHARMA Initiative is. We should give some history on it maybe include the information on the film and then some brief information about the hatches and what they are. Hatches that we know more about like "The Swan" should have its own page that would then contain information such as "the Map", "The Timer", etc... I think that this is a more reasonable solution and would also make it a more logical solution as an encyclopedia article. Please let me know what you think (in your talk page)! And if you do agree please note that on your merge vote! Thanks -- UKPhoenix79 04:01, 13 April 2006 (UTC)