Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Austenasia (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:39, 20 November 2011 editInTheRevolution2 (talk | contribs)202 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 21:11, 20 November 2011 edit undoMartijn Hoekstra (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,333 edits it is eligible under G4, but personally I prefer to let a new AfD runNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
:'''Comment''' - I should have checked for the prior discussion - this should have been speedy deleted as a recreation. ] (]) 20:34, 20 November 2011 (UTC) :'''Comment''' - I should have checked for the prior discussion - this should have been speedy deleted as a recreation. ] (]) 20:34, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''' - ], is there *any* sources for that? And ]? ] (]) 20:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC) :'''Oppose''' - ], is there *any* sources for that? And ]? ] (]) 20:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' I will not be commenting on weather this article should be kept or not, but I checked the original deleted article, and went over the original AfD, and the content is essentially the same, and therefor eligible for deletion under G4. I find it odd however that deletion of micronations has been such a mixed bag, and won't be deleting the article under G4. The AfD was two years ago, and consensus may have changed. If it has not, this AfD might be a precedent for other micronations (as the mentioned ]). ] (]) 21:11, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:11, 20 November 2011

Austenasia

AfDs for this article:
Austenasia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable micronation. Majority of the references are to primary sources or user-submitted sites - little significant coverage from independent sources. Google search on "Austenasia" shows only one result. Standard search shows a lot of unreliable sources, wikis, and primary sources - again, no significant coverage found. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Comment - I should have checked for the prior discussion - this should have been speedy deleted as a recreation. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Oppose - Kugelmugel, is there *any* sources for that? And Republic of Saugeais? InTheRevolution2 (talk) 20:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment I will not be commenting on weather this article should be kept or not, but I checked the original deleted article, and went over the original AfD, and the content is essentially the same, and therefor eligible for deletion under G4. I find it odd however that deletion of micronations has been such a mixed bag, and won't be deleting the article under G4. The AfD was two years ago, and consensus may have changed. If it has not, this AfD might be a precedent for other micronations (as the mentioned Kugelmugel). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:11, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Categories: