| Revision as of 00:13, 21 November 2011 editUnscintillating (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,833 edits →Austenasia: redirect← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:13, 21 November 2011 edit undoGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,057 editsm Listing on WP:DELSORT under EnglandNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| **'''Comment''' - #2&3 of your cites are local coverage, and one of them uses Misplaced Pages for a source - hardly significant coverage, IMHO. ] (]) 22:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | **'''Comment''' - #2&3 of your cites are local coverage, and one of them uses Misplaced Pages for a source - hardly significant coverage, IMHO. ] (]) 22:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Redirect''' to ], which already covers the topic. Edit history should be preserved. ] (]) 00:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | *'''Redirect''' to ], which already covers the topic. Edit history should be preserved. ] (]) 00:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>] (]) 19:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 19:13, 21 November 2011
Austenasia
AfDs for this article:- Articles for deletion/Austenasia
- Articles for deletion/Austenasia (2nd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Austenasia (3rd nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Austenasia (4th nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Austenasia (5th nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Austenasia (6th nomination)
- Articles for deletion/Austenasia (7th nomination)
- Austenasia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable micronation. Majority of the references are to primary sources or user-submitted sites - little significant coverage from independent sources. Google search on "Austenasia" shows only one result. Standard search shows a lot of unreliable sources, wikis, and primary sources - again, no significant coverage found. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - I should have checked for the prior discussion - this should have been speedy deleted as a recreation. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - Kugelmugel, is there *any* sources for that? And Republic of Saugeais? InTheRevolution2 (talk) 20:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- Comment I will not be commenting on weather this article should be kept or not, but I checked the original deleted article, and went over the original AfD, and the content is essentially the same, and therefor eligible for deletion under G4. I find it odd however that deletion of micronations has been such a mixed bag, and won't be deleting the article under G4. The AfD was two years ago, and consensus may have changed. If it has not, this AfD might be a precedent for other micronations (as the mentioned Kugelmugel). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:11, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep JORGENEV 21:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - #2&3 of your cites are local coverage, and one of them uses Misplaced Pages for a source - hardly significant coverage, IMHO. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of micronations, which already covers the topic. Edit history should be preserved. Unscintillating (talk) 00:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)