Revision as of 10:57, 31 March 2006 editWilliam M. Connolley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,008 edits +Persian Gulf← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:25, 31 March 2006 edit undoAndres C. (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,394 edits Paquisha incidentNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | ||
*] Shouldn't articles about battles and/or disputed military outposts be allowed to included the names by which both sides referred to it? Thanks. 20:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)~ | |||
*] Should it also mention the name "Arabian gulf"? 10:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | *] Should it also mention the name "Arabian gulf"? 10:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
*] A long argument about the oportunity to rename ] into ] and so on until ] into ] (and to keep ] as a redirect to ]). ] 08:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | *] A long argument about the oportunity to rename ] into ] and so on until ] into ] (and to keep ] as a redirect to ]). ] 08:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:25, 31 March 2006
Shortcut- ]
- Talk:Paquisha Incident Shouldn't articles about battles and/or disputed military outposts be allowed to included the names by which both sides referred to it? Thanks. 20:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)~
- Persian Gulf Should it also mention the name "Arabian gulf"? 10:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Pope Stephen A long argument about the oportunity to rename Pope Stephen III into Pope Stephen II and so on until Pope Stephen X into Pope Stephen IX (and to keep Pope Stephen X as a redirect to Pope Stephen IX). Švitrigaila 08:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Mehmed-paša Sokolović It is an arguement whether he should be considered a Serb or a Bosniak. --HolyRomanEmperor 16:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk: List of metropolitan areas by population There is an unresolved dispute as to which reference to use for this list/ranking. The choice is between the UN urban agglomerations list and the list by the website citypopulation.de. 20:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Rutherglen whilst everyone seems to agree that the anceint Scots Gaelic etymology of the name should be included in the article, should the Gaelic name of this Lowland Scots town (unused locally) been given equal prominence in an infobox. --15:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- There is a general discussion about the matter HERE - Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 15:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ukraine In the introductive paragraph of that article, the asserted "brief period of independence (1917-1921)" is based on Ukrainian People's Republic (the kind hypothetical reader may take a look on Ukrainian National Revolution (1917-1921) and the quoted sources in Talk:Ukraine). 16:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Joan of Arc Question over primary source as an encyclopedic reference. 21:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Operation Medak Pocket Dispute and possible edit war has gotten out of hand, with constant POV pushing and no cooperation, could soon extend into flaming and personal attacks. Misplaced Pages policy and verifiability of article has been compromised, and all attempts to solve the problems ends in revert.
--04:59, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Falkland Islands Dispute and increasingly edit war over the inclusion of Islas Malvinas in the first line of the article. I would tentatively say that most people have accepted it being there, the remaining question is whether the Malvinas should have some kind of note that it is not the official name, nor the direct translation, something along the lines of commonly known in Spanish speaking countries as..., alternative Spanish name... and others at the talk page. Ian3055 00:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Haydar Dispute on whether this should be an article or a disambig page (see also Haider and its history), and whether it is a WP:POVFORK of Ali (see also Haydar-e-l-Karrar). 01:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:History of the Ecuadorian-Peruvian territorial dispute:There has been a serious edit war over the accuracy and neutrality of information added to the article, with personal attacks and accussations. One of the involved editors asked for Full Protection (granted) and put the case before the Mediation Committee, which was not accepted by the other editor, who seems to prefer instead to have other fellow countrymen as mediators.15:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Paris: Months-long edit war over the validity of a view that Paris' commuter belt should seem as the city itself; predjudiced (and constant) reverts and other bad editing habits. 09:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:I-95 exit list: There already exist more accurate exit lists on several articles such as Interstate 95 in New Jersey, and thus the page was edited to link to those to avoid a content fork. Several editors are reverting this for no apparent reason. 07:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Historical revisionism (negationism) Dispute whether to include the Rwandan genocide and the Srebrenica massacre, both targets of revisionism, in the article. 18:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:al-Khwarizmi Dispute over whether al-Khwarimzi was an Arab or a Persian. 14:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Eastern Front (World War II) Dispute over what should and what should not be in the article. 10:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Freemasonry Dispute over inclusion of disputed material. 04:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Queen's Road and Talk:Queensway, Hong Kong: There are four sections of one road, Queen's Road East, Queensway, Queen's Road Central, Queen's Road West. Should the stub article Queensway, be merged into the article Queen's Road? 22:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Bagha Jatin; dispute over two versions (other at Bagha Jatin/Temp2). 11:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Nicolaus Copernicus - There is a dispute over how to identify the nationality of the subject. "Polish", "Polish of German Ancestry", "Prussian", "European", etc. -20:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh - There has been a lot of trouble in coming to consensus over how the introduction should be worded. I think some fresh points of view will hopefully help resolve this. Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Nagorno-Karabakh - 18:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Terrorism in Kashmir - User:Anonymous editor has repeatedly deleted referenced text on Terrorism in Kashmir. . The text deleted can be seen here and on the talk page. The user is biased on this issue as can be seen by reading the talk pages on Kashmir articles. He deleted referenced material on Indian civilians that lost their lives due to terrorists, on the terrorist camps in Kashmir and Pakistan, on terrorist groups and on Hindus and Sikhs displaced from Kashmir due to terrorists. Deletion of referenced material need valid reasons. He deletes all the different changes by claiming that they're pro-India and pov. The editor who added the changes has left the Misplaced Pages project as a consequence. --10:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Knights Templar (military order) - Comments are requested as to how best to name articles to distinguish between the different meanings of the term Knights Templar -- How can the articles be named to make it clear whether the term is referring to the medieval order during the Crusades, or the modern Freemason degree. 19:38, 18 February 2006 (UTC)