Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:The comment is sourced to a highly-partisan comment piece on the Jewish Chronicle website. It cannot possibly be characterised as a 'Self-description of views' as the section is headed. The JC piece provides no context whatsoever for the statement, and frankly, looks like a bit of selective quoting (or given the author, misquoting) to justify a hatchet-job. And no, if Miliband's comments about Israel are important, it is because he is leader of the Labour party, not because he is a Jew. I suggest that you start by finding a source that provides context for the statement, along with evidence from a reliable source that it was actually seen as significant, and then we can discuss where, if anywhere, it can be added to the article. ] (]) 14:47, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
:The comment is sourced to a highly-partisan comment piece on the Jewish Chronicle website. It cannot possibly be characterised as a 'Self-description of views' as the section is headed. The JC piece provides no context whatsoever for the statement, and frankly, looks like a bit of selective quoting (or given the author, misquoting) to justify a hatchet-job. And no, if Miliband's comments about Israel are important, it is because he is leader of the Labour party, not because he is a Jew. I suggest that you start by finding a source that provides context for the statement, along with evidence from a reliable source that it was actually seen as significant, and then we can discuss where, if anywhere, it can be added to the article. ] (]) 14:47, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
I can look for more citations to support. Do you agree that as a Jew his position on Israel is noteworthy? ] (]) 15:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
In September 2011 in a speech to the ], indicative that the Labour party under Miliband was moving away from the Blair-Brown position of support for Israel, Miliband said that it was right to support the ] ].
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Ed Miliband is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Infobox image
Image A: Ed Miliband on August 27, 2010 cropped.jpg
(Proposed) Image B: Ed Miliband (2010).jpg
The question of which image to have in the infobox, out of the two above, was discussed last year where the general consensus seemed to be to keep Image A until something better came along. But it's been over a year now and I feel a replacement is needed and the discussion should be re-opened.
I believe Image B is aesthetically more pleasing because it's better lit (it better contrasts with the light background; not excessively red), and itswider and not as obviously cropped - Ed doesn't look like he's crammed into the picture. Additionally, I think Image B is a 'nicer' picture of Ed where he's caught in his officially capacity as a speaker (with added articulation with the hands) and leader. B may have the 'wide eyed' look, but it doesn't feature the smile which gives his teeth and his jaw a rather awkward look. In A he seems unaware of the photograph, as if it was taken by surprise. In B he is poised for the picture and staring clearly ahead which gives us a clearer profile of his whole face (no shadow over half his face).
- Support A - portrait style and looking into the article as per MOS. The the 'wide eyed' surprised look just makes him look like a bog eyed alien. What we are more looking for at this time - both pictures are dated for a UK political leader is a new picture, one year more updated. Both pictures in this discussion have their issues - better than putting energy into this dated discussion is to find a high quality much more recent one. - note - I added pic c a crop of b - its better without the invisible ball holding hands - although the raised eyebrows and the surprised eyes still rule it out for me. The current pic, although not perfect has , normal eyebrows, pleasant smile and is a portrait style looking into the article as per MOS for biography infobox pictures. I was looking at this photostream. - Off2riorob (talk) 23:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Yes some of those are - how you check is look to the right hand side and click on the link - Some rights reserved and you are led to a screen with the copyright status -like http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en most of the commons licenses are usable on commons - unless it says no derivatives or no non educational bla bla - you get the picture. We could definitely use updating to a 2011 picture.Off2riorob (talk) 23:52, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
This comment seems a perfectly good addition. As Miliband is a Jew his comments about Israel seem to be quite important. He made it in his opening speech as Labour leader where you would expect him to lay out his positions. It was removed with the comment, "Not a 'self description of views' and sourced to a highly-questionable article" - that seems strange, Miliband said in his first speech as leader...bla bla, that seems to clearly be his - (actually quite well known) position and written in a Jewish publication, is the www.thejc.com not a wikipedia reliable source? Youreallycan (talk) 14:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
The comment is sourced to a highly-partisan comment piece on the Jewish Chronicle website. It cannot possibly be characterised as a 'Self-description of views' as the section is headed. The JC piece provides no context whatsoever for the statement, and frankly, looks like a bit of selective quoting (or given the author, misquoting) to justify a hatchet-job. And no, if Miliband's comments about Israel are important, it is because he is leader of the Labour party, not because he is a Jew. I suggest that you start by finding a source that provides context for the statement, along with evidence from a reliable source that it was actually seen as significant, and then we can discuss where, if anywhere, it can be added to the article. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:47, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
In September 2011 in a speech to the Labour Friends of Israel, indicative that the Labour party under Miliband was moving away from the Blair-Brown position of support for Israel, Miliband said that it was right to support the Palestinianbid for statehood.
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
Image A:
(Proposed) Image B:
.jpg)
_cropped.jpg)