Misplaced Pages

Talk:Feminism/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Feminism Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:23, 5 December 2011 editCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 editsm ce← Previous edit Revision as of 20:01, 5 December 2011 edit undoCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 edits updateNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<small> <small>


#Science: Could a sentence or two explaining how these ideas differ from the traditional scientific view be added along with what the response of the scientific community to these ideas has been? #Science: Could a sentence or two explaining how these ideas differ from the traditional scientific view be added along with what the response of the scientific community to these ideas has been?{{partly done}}
#In the "Relationship to political movements" section the introduction <s>needs to be removed and</s> a clear sentence should be added.{{partly done}} #In the "Relationship to political movements" section the introduction <s>needs to be removed and</s> a clear sentence should be added.{{partly done}}
#Theoretical schools: The second paragraph seems be entirely about literary theory. You need to place this paragraph in the context of feminist theory in general, showing us why a discussion of literary theory is appropriate here.{{partly done}} #Theoretical schools: The second paragraph seems be entirely about literary theory. You need to place this paragraph in the context of feminist theory in general, showing us why a discussion of literary theory is appropriate here.{{partly done}}

Revision as of 20:01, 5 December 2011

  1. Science: Could a sentence or two explaining how these ideas differ from the traditional scientific view be added along with what the response of the scientific community to these ideas has been? Partly done
  2. In the "Relationship to political movements" section the introduction needs to be removed and a clear sentence should be added. Partly done
  3. Theoretical schools: The second paragraph seems be entirely about literary theory. You need to place this paragraph in the context of feminist theory in general, showing us why a discussion of literary theory is appropriate here. Partly done
  4. The "Late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries" section seems US-centric. What is going on in the rest of the world right now? Partly done
  5. The movements & ideologies section may need reorganization in order to make it clearer and less complex for readers. Done
  6. Lead: mention feminism's effects on society, since that is a major part of the article.  Done
  7. Similarly, the article has a picture some Parisian suffragettes, but France is not even mentioned in the article body. Done
  8. Literature section - the second two paragraphs may be overly specific, giving the names of a few important feminist texts instead of describing the general development of feminist literature as a whole. The entire period from 1818 until the 1960s is skipped over. Undue weight may be given to feminist science fiction. Done

Please see Talk:Feminism/GA1