| Revision as of 20:59, 30 December 2011 editYoureallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits →joining in discussion: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:00, 30 December 2011 edit undoYoureallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits →joining in discussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| == joining in discussion == | == joining in discussion == | ||
| If you are going to assert any weight to your comments in discussion then your removal of good faith comments in regard to those comments of yours is demeaning to your position - as such if you are unprepared to contribute and accept good faith efforts I will give your position the limited respective value (nill)it deserves in the discussion. ] (]) 20:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC) | If you are going to assert any weight to your comments in discussion then your removal of good faith comments in regard to those comments of yours is demeaning to your position - as such if you are unprepared to contribute and accept good faith efforts I will give your position the limited respective value (nill) it deserves in the discussion. ] (]) 20:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:00, 30 December 2011
| ⇒ ⇒ So long, and thanks for all the fish… ⇐ ⇐ I have I drop in twice or thrice in awhile. |
Global Automakers
Hello, Scheinwerfermann. I see you've added some comments following a few of my own on the topic of Global Automakers; you can now find my replies on the WikiProject Autos and Global Automakers Talk pages. Meanwhile, I am happy to work with you to bring the article in line with community standards, however I would like to ask that you at least be polite to me. Although you are skeptical of my motivations, and I understand why that is, I hope that you will please allow me the courtesy of being civil. Thanks, WWB Too (talk) 22:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have not been the slightest bit uncivil to you, sir or madam, and if we're starting this conversation with an implication otherwise, we're getting off to rather a bad start. —Scheinwerfermann ·C23:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- So far your reactions to my outreach have included "Yumpin' yiminy" and "Good gravy", among other judgmental turns of phrase. If you can agree to hold back these comments and keep the focus on sources and guidelines, I'd appreciate it. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 00:27, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Nothin' doin'. If you consider family-friendly exclamations such as "good gravy" and "yumpin' yiminy", used in critique of Misplaced Pages content, to be "uncivil", then I can only suggest you grow a much thicker skin in as big a hurry as you're able to muster, for I shan't crimp my rhetorical style merely to suit what appears to be your unusually keen sensitivity thereto. Furthermore, I reserve the right to use other such family-friendly exclamations, including but not limited to "gracious goodness me", "land sakes alive", "I do declare", "great Caesar's ghost", and "oh, my stars and garters". You will simply have to cope. —Scheinwerfermann ·C00:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
joining in discussion
If you are going to assert any weight to your comments in discussion then your removal of good faith comments in regard to those comments of yours is demeaning to your position - as such if you are unprepared to contribute and accept good faith efforts I will give your position the limited respective value (nill) it deserves in the discussion. Youreallycan (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC)